User talk:A930913/Archives/2015/Nov

Bracketbot's welcome
This is lulz for a vandal. "Thank you for your contributions", ORLY? I'd suggest a more neutral text: "Thank you for your interest" - üser:Altenmann >t 17:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Arguably yes, but I don't think that's a high priority. Huon (talk) 21:31, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

ReferenceBot
ReferenceBot often takes a long time to post. Given this would it be possible to re-check the page before doing so? Most if not all the messages I get are for problems I have already fixed. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 00:28, 8 November 2015 (UTC).


 * To my knowledge the bot only leaves a message if the problem hasn't been fixed for some time. The delay is deliberate to give people time to review the article on their own. I checked the last ReferenceBot notification on your talk page, and that pointed to a then-not-yet-fixed issue. If you're notified of a problem that already was resolved at the time of the notification, that's a bug; could you please provide links when that happens? Huon (talk) 21:31, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * You're right. I was thinking that it only notified of "big red errors" (mismatched tags,  duplicate definitions and used but not defined) but it seems it also notifies on "little red errors". All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:51, 10 November 2015 (UTC).

Impressionism
Hello Mr. A930913,

first thank you for your helpful note.

The reason for my supplement was:

The Dutch Impressionism is very important. There were contacts from Holland to Paris, Barbizon, Brussels, Dusseldorf and Weimar. And it is wrong, if this is not clearly expressed. And this article is incorrect. It lacks the designation of essential artists of the Netherlands during the period of the international flow of impressionism!

And I wanted to heal this very big mistake. - This list is wiped away. I dont know who ist was, it is a bit very stange to wikipedia.uk.Co and me!

Now my question to you, how do we get the cow from the ice?

Many greetings

Hirschfeldt (talk) 09:59, 11 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Your addition was removed by User:Modernist, as you can see in the page history. My suggestion would be to discuss the question of how many Dutch impressionists should be listed on the article's talk page. Huon (talk) 23:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

ReferenceBot – Marcelhorvath50
[large chunk of broken code removed]
 * I have no idea what you meant to do, but it looks like malformed spam to me. Huon (talk) 23:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

 * Thanks! Just so you're not surprised, I had to fix the four tildes of your signature here because your cupcake (which I'm sure the bot and its operator will appreciate) got caught up in the broken code of the preceding edit and wasn't properly displayed. Huon (talk) 23:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)