User talk:A930913/Archives/2016/Feb

Manitoba is bigger than Alberta and Saskatchewan
Manitoba is bigger than Alberta and Saskatchewan. You removed it for no reason — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.124.168.113 (talk) 21:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Neither the bot nor A930913 removed that edit. That said, Statistics Canada disagrees with your assessment of those territories' sizes. Given the choice between a random person on the internet and the statistics office of the government of Canada, I think we'll go with the latter. Huon (talk) 17:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Error
I was trying on my cell to add in the next categories and as I was doing that the reference might have been accidentally deleted. I'm not sure which article she used so I have not fixed the 2016 skating page yet Wifey93 (talk) 01:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I have fixed the references. Breaking one reference easily can leave large parts of the article dysfunctional. Huon (talk) 20:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

NGC 77
Since you gave told me the reference error, I've been trying to fix it, but someone else fixed it for me. Thanks for telling me. OwenJiang 10:12 19 February 2016 (China Standard Time) —Preceding undated comment added 01:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Huon (talk) 20:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Insertion of advert
A user Edward321 has inserted "advert" at the top of my article Herman George Scheffauer, this results in the assertion "This article contains content that is written like an advertisement, etc". The same user does not actually specify what it is he considers badly written about the article, which is an affront and rather demeaning. I am based in Germany and there is no advertising on the page. I doubt if the same user is even qualified to comment on the biographical facts displayed. If the user will be more empirical it might help, what is it that he finds objectionable? How does one ask Wikipedia to look into the actions of other users who go around adding "Advert" to web pages. It constitutes almost a form of vandalism within the very idea of Wikipedia which is a great shame. Procureur2014 (talk) 17:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, I have replied to this question on your talk page. The template is generally only used on your own talk page. LoudLizard (talk) 18:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)