User talk:ABDEVILLIERS0007

May 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. lTopGunl (talk) 08:11, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. lTopGunl (talk) 10:31, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Afghanistan. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --M4gnum0n (talk) 08:41, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 14:07, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kashmir, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Qwrk (talk) 20:12, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Kashmir, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ARV requested Qwrk (talk) 20:14, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of Rajputs. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 21:12, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing; including BLP vios and attacks on other editors as well as not adhering to WP:V and WP:NPOV. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  10:19, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elockid  ( Talk ) 15:51, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Elockid  ( Talk ) 12:35, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you post an improperly placed joke on Wikipedia again, as seen at Kashmir, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''When I try and dissect your behaviour and see how people respond to it - with bans and such - I best advise you take a long hike on a short pier. Enjoy ;-)'' Qwrk (talk) 18:07, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Personal attacks
Please do not attack people as you have done in this contribution. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 21:03, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. lTopGunl (talk) 07:50, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 00:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)