User talk:ACBest/Archive Three

Your RfA
Hi. I've just taken a look at your request for adminship. We appreciate your dedication to Wikipedia and the work you have done for the project thus far. However, I have to agree with the commenters who have opined that your experience probably is not enough for you to be a well-qualified administrator just yet. Because your current RfA is not likely to pass, I think it would be in your best interests to withdraw it at this time and try again later when you have addressed some of the opposers' concerns.

I do, however, want to say that in my case at least, the concerns are entirely related to your level of experience on-wiki and not to your actual age. This year alone, we have elected at least two self-identified 12-year-old admins who have been doing excellent jobs. When you are ready, you will be ready regardless of what the calendar says.

Finally, one other concern I have concerns the amount of identifying information that you have on your userpage. Normally this would not concern me but deciding how much detail about your real-world identity to publish on the Internet is one of the areas in which a person's age may actually matter. If you plan to be an active editor and eventually an administrator in the future, you should be aware that there have been incidents in which admins have been harassed in retaliation for their administrator actions. This sort of thing can be damaging to any admin but it is particularly concerning in the case of younger editors and admins. Please give this some thought and, if you have any questions, contact an admin or experienced editor you trust to discuss them. Regards, Newyorkbrad 23:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I've already closed your nomination per SNOW, as it is apparent that there will be no consensus for promotion. I'd strongly suggest that you take their advice and address the concerns before you nominate yourself again.  Regards, ( [ →]O - RLY?) 01:34, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Hello
Well, it's nice to see someone around my age! I've been looking for someone as long as I've been here! My name's Jonathan, want to be friends?  jonjonbt  talk • contribs  02:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Protection
Hi, I put semi-protection on your talk page menu. I also changed the protection from full to semi on your user page menu since WP:PROTECT allows for semi-protection to be requested for user pages, but doesn't say anything about full protection. Best wishes/ Pax:Vobiscum 21:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
For reverting vandalism to my userspace. Much appreciated.  Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 05:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Reference desk
Ok, I reverted my changes, since you prefer them that way. Sorry trying to be helpful is considered vandalism these days.


 * Hey you should go back and revert that terrible vandalism on the reference desk! They put all those threads into one section!

Please see User talk:129.78.64.106.

You're...
...welcome, just doin' ma job :o) Thanks for the barnstar :o) Drivenapart 07:51, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Sig
I noticed you were in the process of shortening your sig, so I wanted to point this out. Autograph books etc are against the signature guidelines (WP:SIG). While they are not against policy, they are against guidelines and are usually a waste of space (in signatures, that is). I just noticed, so thought i'd point that out. Thanks! Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 08:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Be careful
I created the article 'Conyers Herring' on 09:42, 30 July 2007. And you posted delete tag on 09:43, 30 July 2007. You just waited for one minute! I was looking for the information on Herring! I added much information to the article. In future, I will add more information. Please don't do anything to the article. Thank you. RS2007 10:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Personal Information
ACBest, you seem to have a significant amount of information on your page which makes yourself identifiable. As Newyorkbrad points out, this is one area where age matters. I would strongly advise you to remove some of the information, in particular the photo of yourself. Keep up the good work on wikipedia, but please think about what I've just said. Tom::Leave a message 13:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

User blocks
Blocking a user stops them from editing anything except their own talk page. This allows them to post a request for unblock if they choose. Further vandalism to one's own talk page results in the talk page being protected from editing. NawlinWiki 23:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Reply
Im reply to your question here, yes your template was where I got the idea from. The new designs are now in place. I have added a navigation bar to your template to bring it in line with the others. However, I could not work out how to change the text colour to black, so it matched with the title bar. --Jorvik 10:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
ACBest- Thank you for trying to help me with my post. Do you have any suggestions on how I can keep it from being removed? (Simplydc 18:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC))

Be more careful


Not sure what you were trying to do, but you ended up removing half of the entire article. If you must use an automated editing tool (which is quite possible to get along without; I've got almost 20k edits, and have never used one), please pay closer attention to what you're doing.

There's a very fine difference between an automated edit and an automated screw-up. :) EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 18:29, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Newark North Gate railway station
Hi - and thanks for all the work you've done on this article. I hope you understand my reasons for removing the information about today's failed train, but I think your solution of showing it as a picture is a good one. You might like to consider doing some other clean-up - the picture of the bus isn't really relevant to the article, as this is primarily about the railway station not the bus route. Maybe you could put the photo in the gallery instead - which would remove a lot of the white space. Also, do you have any more information about the station - when was it built, which company built it, etc.? – Tivedshambo (talk) 21:31, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The line was opened in 1853 (see Great Northern Railway (Great Britain), and I suspect the station would have opened then or soon afterwards by that company. Another thing worth mentioning is the flat crossing north of the station - unique in the UK. You'll need to find citeable evidence for these. Good luck! – Tivedshambo (talk) 05:39, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Adoption
I warn you, I can be quite strict, and terse. I have quite high standards too. But if you're sure you want me to adopt you, I will. --Deskana (banana) 21:47, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay then. Add the box to your userpage. Please remove the signature book from your signature, too. --Deskana (banana) 21:51, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * You really need to tone down your userpage too. --Deskana (banana) 21:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I've toned it down for you. It's important to remember that your userpage isn't owned by you, it's owned by the Wikipedia community, and as such, the community on the whole decides what content is appropriate and what is not. Your userpage was really over the top. --Deskana (banana) 22:10, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * That userbox you've readded encourages vandals. By gloriously stating "My userpage has been vandalised four times!", you're goading them into making it a fifth. We prefer to deny them recognition rather than encourage them. --Deskana (banana) 11:41, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Your userspace is over the top as well. Would you mind going through and tagging some of the excess pages with db-author? ~  Wi ki her mit  17:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Your NPWatcher application
Dear ACBest,

Thank you for applying for NPWatcher!

Spartaz Humbug! 06:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Where may i find?
Where may i find a page with a list of all pictures i've uploaded?  AC Best  20:38, 13 August 2007 (UTC)


 * You can have a look at your log page. KTC 20:45, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

What seems to be the problem?
Whats the problem with Lincoln Central. I just checked the article, and there seems to be nothing uncited - the pictures tell it all!  AC Best  18:09, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I took a look and the article seems to be all pictures, although I have no idea about the subject matter. You can be bold and add refs and fix the formatting. :) - Two Oars 18:17, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * So that's why I had to travel by coach today to there instead of trains! :D Back to point, maybe you can raise it up with the original editor who raised the ref tag? KTC 18:19, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Having actually went through it. The unreference tag is fair. There's a lot of what is effectively news reporting in there about what is going on, with absolutely no source cited providing those information. KTC 18:25, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, and no unfortuanly. The pictures show the train station, the "new" ticket barriers etc. along with the notice about work being done. They do not provide verifiable secondary source for information such as its history or even more simply things like the Platform layout section. I'll give a couple of example. An average reader (i.e. not someone from Lincoln, UK) can not be sure that there's 5 platforms at Lincoln Central, number from 3 to 7, because there's no source stating those facts. Claims like "Although many passengers believe that ....." and "Some people have been complaining about the station being closed during this period" also need to be avoid on Wikipedia unless you can find a source that state that. Maybe something like the Lincolnshire Echo have written something? KTC 19:27, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Adoption
Hi ACBest. I just wanted to suggest that you find someone else to adopt you. I think I have too many commitments to be able to properly help you with adoption. You can still ask me questions whenever you like, I just don't think adoption will work. I hope you understand :-) --Deskana (banana) 19:36, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Notice on your userpage
You have a notice on your userpage that reads "[...] a classmate has vandalised an article and logged into my account - Please DO NOT block me for it."; in case you didn't know, your account is your responsibility, and so any vandal-istic edits made under your account will be considered to be made by you, and not classmates. If you don't want to get blocked for edits supposedly made by classmates, then don't log into your account at school. – sebi 09:26, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Ad for WikiProject Antarctica Highways
I see no point to this - the project is only a humor thing - doesn't the ads thing serve to benefit Wikipedia as an encyclopedia? I do understand that fun can be beneficial, but this seems to be a little too much in my view.  master son T - C 15:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Project shortcut
I thought you might be interested in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways. Simply south 20:37, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Vandal
No problem. I've reported him. Hopefully that will be taken care of real soon. His racist personal attacks should get a lengthy ban...if there is any justice in the world.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  21:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2 days. Eh, better than just 1.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  21:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, here's to a less intense rest of the day. Happy editing.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  21:36, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Non-free photos on user page
Hello there...

You may want to consider removing the photos of Sen. Craig from your user page, since the photos are copyrighted (that is, non-free) and not in the public domain. The photos are subject to removal by any user of Wikipedia according to the rules for what you can have on your user page. If you want more information about the use of images on a user page, please see Images on user pages.  →   Lwalt ♦ talk 21:51, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:HPIM0813.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:HPIM0813.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 18:06, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, ACBest! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page.  Daniel  10:12, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Newark North Gate/Lincoln Central
I don't appreciate being threatened for making edits to Wikipedia which I feel are warranted, so don't do so. 129.31.40.64 11:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Y'know, for all those images, cc-by-sa would probably be better. It's virtually the same as the license that you use now anyway. --Deskana (talky) 12:02, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Re
Wow cool, thanks :P — Adriaan (T★C) 17:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Happy Birthday
 ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:04, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * FROM YOUR FRIEND:
 * You are WELCOME. I'm just here doing my job. Would you like to sign my autograph book? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

 Pat Politics rule!  00:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Just have the best b-day you can!  Pat Politics rule!  12:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!
Lemonflash (do something)  00:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

User:ACBest/Credit
Could I ask that you clarify the purpose of this template which you have used on a number of your images such that it does not require permission to be sought from you for your images to be used under the Attribution licence which only requires that you are correctly credited for the work. User:ACBest/Credit makes the licence invalid and means the images are not freely licensed as is required. Adambro 10:44, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TomasBat/Universal Autographs.
Hello,. I noticed you have User:TomasBat/Universal Autographs in your signature page, and I thought I should notify you of the MfD discussion currently taking place for it. · AndonicO Talk 01:39, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

The Simpsons WikiProject membership update
The Simpsons WikiProject is performing a membership update to check for currently active and idle members.

Because your username appears on the members list, we kindly ask you visit this page and put your name under the appropriate section, using the code , in order to renew or cancel your membership.

If you do not comply with any of the choices, at the end of 1 month after this message was posted, your membership will be canceled and your name removed from the list. If you wish to regain your membership, just sign in again!

The The Simpsons WikiProject team – June 29, 2024

Holiday Commitee
Would you be interested in joining a holiday commitee?  Socks 01   08:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Futurama Roll Call
Hello, you are currently listed as a member of Wikiproject Futurama though you may be inactive. This seems to be the case for many members so I am sending this message to help renew interest in working on these articles. If you are still interested in working on Futurama related tasks please visit the wikiproject page to see how you can help. If you have time please also join in the recent discussions on the talk page, in particular I would personally appreciate comments on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Futurama. Thank you for your time, hopefully I didn't annoy you too much. If you would not like to receive messages such as this in the future then consider removing yourself from WikiProject Futurama/List of participants. Happy editing. Stardust8212 01:55, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Virgin Mobile logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Virgin Mobile logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter for November 2007
The November 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the December 2007 issue. Dr. Cash 01:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Template:Future UK public transportation‎;
Hi there with the Template:Future UK public transportation‎, I don't really mind if a different image is used, however as Central Trains are about to lose their franchise within a matter of days from now, it's possibly not the best choice for a template about Future UK public transportation‎! If you've got something else a bit more forward-looking (Eurostar perhaps?) maybe you could put that in. It isn't just about trains, however!

best, --Cnbrb 01:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Logo / Image
If you look at the "Source" on Image:Logo-freightliner.jpg it is at http://www.trainspottingtales.org.uk/freightlivery.htm ...yes, it is an image, it is used under Non-free use rationale ...hope this helps. If you have a better image, please delete mine. Seth Whales 15:15, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Franchise changeover
When updating articles on stations, don't forget to change the "Managed by" field in the infobox. Also, discussion over colours is taking place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways. --Jorvik 19:37, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, if you're updating station articles, it's also necessary to change the content of the article so it matches the succession boxes. (And East Midlands Trains don't operate anywhere near Ashchurch!)  --RFBailey 22:29, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

If you are interested ???
You probably already have this, but a good site for Train Operator logos is at http://rpm-railpics.fotopic.net/ but you proably already know this? Seth Whales 19:57, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Lincoln
Regarding this revert:


 * 1) While East Midlands Trains and National Express East Coast have made genuine proposals to start direct services from Lincoln to London, neither has yet to be fully confirmed, as far as I am aware.  (Over the years, I've seen many such proposals fail to happen, or not to last very long: Virgin's London-Shrewsbury service being one example, Virgin Cross Country services to Portsmouth being another, and so on.)  Until a specific start date and timetable has been published, it's best still to regard these as just proposals, and to take them with a pinch of salt.  While these are plans are far more realistic than, say, those of Humber Coast and City (or whatever they're called), they are still only proposals.
 * 2) For future services, it's best not to put them in the previous/next station boxes, until the route has been fully confirmed.  That's the case with the Grand Central service, which is due to start in the next few weeks, but certainly not the case with NXEC's proposed Lincoln service.
 * 3) When using the undo button, make sure that you want to revert all of an edit, not just part of it.  In making the change you made, as well as replacing the service boxes (which is, I believe, what you intended to do) you managed to reverse various other changes I made to the article, such as modifying the opening paragraphs.  Please take care when making reverts!

Thanks, --RFBailey 00:03, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Given your most recent edit to Lincoln Central railway station, you don't appear to have acknowledged much of what I said above. Could you explain why you made this change, please?  --RFBailey 19:30, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Fair enough, however there's still the points that (i) we don't have a published, confirmed start date (probably the December 2008 timetable change?) and (ii) we don't know the stopping pattern (e.g. will it run non-stop to Nottingham, will it call at Newark Castle, or somewhere else?). For reasons such as these, I don't think it's ever a good idea to include "proposed" or "future" services in the succession boxes.


 * Also, you still need to be careful about reverting other changes--why did you undo my change to the opening paragraph, for instance? By accident?  If so, take care!  --RFBailey 20:42, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Tut tut tut myself, i will be more careful...  ACBest Dog and Bone  14:18, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

The editor review box
Hi ACBest, you should really do something about that editor review box. If you view diffs on your page, it messes up. Take a look. --Deskana (talk) 14:23, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

NXEC
This is strange but thank you for reverting me! It does look better. Simply south (talk) 21:32, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

User:ACBest/Credit
I left you a message about this template you use on some of your images back in September but you archived the page before commenting so I can only presume you missed it. See this diff for the message. It is important that you clarify that whilst you may wish to be informed about how your images are been used, it is not permissible to require people contact you before doing so providing their use is within the licence. Adambro (talk) 19:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


 * If you do nothing to resolve this issue I'm afraid I'll have to propose all images which include this template be deleted as not freely licensed. Adambro (talk) 17:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter for December 2007
The December 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the January 2008 issue. Dr. Cash 00:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Victoria Line train leaving depot.jpg
No; I can assure you it's a genuine photo from the footbridge over the tracks just south of Northumberland Park Depot, in September this year. The slightly "shiny-and-new" look of the train (and track) is due to it absolutely pelting down with rain at the time. — iride <font color="#C1118C">scent  23:08, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

User:ACBest/FromTheTrack
I'm not sure including this on images is very wise. Anyone can see the signs for themselves, your simply stating the obvious that you aren't allowed on the track. Also, whilst you I'm sure are pleased to have been able to take the associated photo, it is not necessarily true that in doing so you didn't commit trespass. Whilst you might have been "allowed" by the driver, he is probably not legally in a position to grant such permission. This means that it is likely by permitting you to take this photo that he either committed an offence himself or knowingly let you commit an offence which is probably against company rules.

Including the template is not useful in warning people away from the tracks and only serves to highlight you and the driver's instance of rule breaking, therefore I suggest it is somewhat misguided to use this. I suggest you remove it and tag the user subpage for deletion. Adambro (talk) 18:20, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia image policy
Hi there - per Wikipedia's image policy, you cannot upload your own images with any restrictiobsa to their use. Per our image policy, "Wikipedia encourages users to upload their own images, but all user-created images must be licensed under a free license (such as the GFDL and/or an acceptable Creative Commons license) or be released into the public domain (no copyright)." Therefore, your credit template User:ACBest/Credit has been rolled back to an acceptable version. However, your other credit template User:ACBest/Credit/DaveKimberleyCollection, along with the photo that it applied to, has had to be deleted, as there was no assertion from the copyright holder of permission - please see Image use policy. Thanks.  BLACK KITE  00:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:ACBest/CopyrightChecked
User:ACBest/CopyrightChecked, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ACBest/CopyrightChecked and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:ACBest/CopyrightChecked during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Adambro (talk) 20:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Your images
Thanks for your message on your talk page regarding your images. I've not been retaining User:ACBest/Credit since it is an exact copy of Template:Attribution with the additional of your own name. Providing your name is included in the description on Commons then I feel this is acceptable. I will accept that this might not be completely the case on Commons yet and I will ensure your name is added to the image descriptions. Maybe you might wish to consider revising how you specify the author name to avoid duplication with the other template. On a slightly different topic, it might be helpful if you upload images with a more descriptive name than the default your camera uses. Adambro (talk) 18:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * See Image:31107 at Derby.jpg for an example where I've amended the image page to specify your name as the author of the image as requested. I will work to ensure that your other images which I've moved to Commons follow this same format. The Attribution template requires you are attributed as the author as you wish per User:ACBest/Credit. Hope you enjoy your new camera. Adambro (talk) 18:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I've though a bit more about this issue and suggest that rather than using Attribution and User:ACBest/Credit on your images that you use

which will produces the following:


 * This simplifies your images pages by combining the information into one template. I will be changing the images already on Commons to use this format. If you do decide to use this, you could change User:ACBest/Credit to the text above and then just use that on all images which you release as attribution required. In this case you'd be advised to subsitute this by typing rather than just  . If you have any questions about this then don't hesitate to let me know.


 * Nice to see you getting out with your new camera, it looks like a newer version of the one I've got. I especially like Image:PanaromaofTamworthStationFront.JPG. Did you use some software to merge some images together? Regards. Adambro (talk) 14:10, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hull trains logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Hull trains logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles January Newsletter
Happy New Year! Here is the latest edition of the WikiProject GA Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 03:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)