User talk:ACTAB

October 2013
Hello, I'm GraemeL. I noticed that you recently removed some content from ACT Alberta without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! GraemeL (talk) 16:10, 23 October 2013 (UTC)


 * You might well have a WP:COI, so please take extra care to be neutral. Many thanks. Jamesx12345 16:24, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=578576807 your edit] to ACT Alberta may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:54, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * ACT Alberta's purpose is to mobilize stakeholders to identify and respond to [human trafficking]through prevention efforts, ensuring adequate protection and support for

Conflict of interest
Hello, ACTAB. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article ACT Alberta, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Neelix (talk) 20:13, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Neelix. I understand your concerns about conflict of interest, but I don't see that anything that I've said is biased. They are all verifiable facts - I have tried to be very careful in this. If you do see anything in particular that you find to be biased, please let me know. ACTAB (talk) 15:12, 28 October 2013 (UTC)ACTAB

I would appreciate being allowed to make changes on this page! As it currently stands, it is quite misleading and outdated. ACTAB (talk) 15:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)ACTAB


 * Hi ACT Alberta,


 * There are a few things you should know before attempting to edit the ACT Alberta article again. Firstly, unsourced information is not allowed on Wikipedia; if you have information to add to the article, it must have reliable sources to back it up, and most of these sources should be secondary sources. Secondly, validly sourced information should not be removed from Wikipedia articles; if the information is outdated, the old information should remain while the new information should be added, along with sources. Thirdly, on Wikipedia, user accounts are specific to individuals, not organizations; because the user account "ACTAB" references the name of an organization, it suggests that it is a communal account and should therefore not be used. I therefore recommend that you create an account for you as an individual, not as the organization you represent. Finally, users with a conflict of interest, whether they see themselves as biasing articles or not, should be very careful in editing Wikipedia; the circumstances under which an editor with a conflict of interest is permitted to edit related articles are very restrictive. If you are employed by ACT Alberta, I would highly recommend contacting WikiProject Cooperation to coordinate changes to the article. Alternatively, you can start a discussion on the article's talk page and I would be glad to review your concerns. I hope you find this information helpful.


 * Neelix (talk) 16:00, 28 October 2013 (UTC)