User talk:ACollalti

Welcome!
Hello, ACollalti, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! WikiAviator (talk) 10:21, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Hello, ACollalti. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Scientific articles should mainly reference review articles to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

Editing in this way is also a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see WP:EXPERT. I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add requestedit to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

MrOllie (talk) 12:13, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

deleted references
Dear Wikipedia, while I can agree with your decision to remove citations to some my (published) papers I cannot understand (nor agree) why at any time I tried to include in a list of (specifically) "Hybrid models of forest production" "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_models_of_forest_production" the our Hybrid model of forest production (which is largely cited and published elsewhere) and without directly citing our own work, Wikipedia delete even also the link to the model web-page (as also other model do). What's the matter with our model? Thanks in advance Best Regards Alessio Collalti
 * The response is here.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  21:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:3D-CMCC-FEM
It seems that you created this draft page in your sandbox by copying and pasting an article that has a deletion tag on it. This confuses both bots and human editors. If you don't know what you are trying to do, please ask for advice rather than copying things in a way that breaks them. If you are a scientist, you should know to use proper caution with your laboratory apparatus so as not to break it or cause it to short out. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)