User talk:ADDASoftware

Welcome!
Hello, ADDASoftware, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Nick Moyes (talk) 13:21, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Avoiding commentary
Hi there. It can be disappointing when edits you make get immediately reverted, but I just wanted to explain that the type of commentary you've just been adding to a number of articles, whilst correct in essence, are too much like a commentary or opinion, and not really suitable for an encyclopaedia article. As a result, I've had to remove them. Please try to stick to adding statements that are based upon what reliable sources say about a topic, and avoid adding what you personally think.

Whilst I'm here, I'd also advise you that your username is suggestive of a promotional product. ADDA software appears to exist in India, so I would suggest you abandon this account and create another account name that doesn't appear to conflict with any other company name. See WP:ORGNAME for our policy. Providing you never use this accountname again, you'll be fine. Do pop over to ask at the Teahouse if you need any further assistance. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 13:37, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Yunshui 雲 水 14:39, 27 June 2019 (UTC)