User talk:AE Uppercut

September 2018
Hello. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Botn seemed less than neutral and has been removed. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 16:48, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cardiff. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cardiff was changed by AE Uppercut (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962053 on 2018-09-06T16:52:37+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cardiff, you may be blocked from editing. Iggy (Swan) 16:56, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Biafra. JesseRafe (talk) 17:44, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Purplebricks. JesseRafe (talk) 17:44, 6 September 2018 (UTC)