User talk:AErhart92

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mouse, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mouse was changed by AErhart92 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-09-05T03:38:11+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:38, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Stephen Chen
The article Stephen Chen has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:03, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Biblical science
Replacing scientific information with biblical dogma isn't helpful to anyone. It's also a violation of WP:NOR. The prediction laid out in the Bible is significantly LESS reliable than the current scientific estimate, as it relies entirely on the assumption that 2,000 years of translation (after however many years of being told from memory) had little to no effect on the Bible text. Ever played 'Telephone'? The muslims have the right idea. They consider the qu'ran only to be correct in the original Arabic, whereas the King James bible, arbitrarily written in latin-infused English, is somehow the De Facto standard for all things Jesus. -- King Öomie 06:21, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, you're probably about the hundredth person to decide that the Young Earth Creationism article should expand its territory. Age of the Earth is going to remain rooted in scientific observation, for the same reason the science-minded aren't trouncing all over the religious articles. You stay on your side, we'll stay on ours. -- King Öomie 06:25, 5 September 2009 (UTC)