User talk:AFreshStart/Archive 2

Non-free images
Hi,

You have recently uploaded some non-free. None of them have non-free usage rationales. This is required (See WP:NFCC Several of them are images of living people.  Almost all such images are not compliant with Wikipedia's guidelines for non-free content as it contravenes policy point 1 which covers replaceability.  From the guidelines, "Non-free content should not be used when a freely licensed file that serves the same purpose can reasonably be expected to be uploaded, as is the case for almost all portraits of living people." -- Whpq (talk) 04:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you, and sorry for not including rationales. I will try to add them to these images ASAP. --Bangalamania (talk) 04:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Regarding this edit. That is not a non-free usage rationale.  You need to add Non-free use rationale or one of the more specific ones from Category:Non-free use rationale templates and ensure all the fields are filled in to explain how all the non-free content criteria are met. -- Whpq (talk) 12:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

 * Thank you, your cookies are delicious! And you're very welcome, I hope it's accurate as I'm not an expert in the subject area. --Bangalamania (talk) 02:20, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem. However, I was concerned about that quote you put in the article. I rewrote it, and now I'm going to ask an administrator if the old revisions should be revdeleted. It isn't good to copy in that matter. But anyway, thank you for recreating the article! Scorpions13256 (talk) 02:29, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh. I see you are aware of what I did. Oops. Scorpions13256 (talk) 02:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Requesting article expansion help
Greetings

Requesting you to visit article Draft:Sexual politics  and please do expand them if find yourself interested.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 06:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Barnstar!
I had a quick look at your Nikocado Avocado article. Mostly it's really good, seems to have got right to the heart of what he's all about, good job! Though this is just a quick assessment so I may be wrong. I know very little about mukbang, a while back I was reading various systematic reviews for off wiki consulting & I was seeing Muckbang mentioned a lot, that's the only reason I made a small edit to the main article. The one thing that needs work is that per WP:OR, someone needs to either cite or rever the major claim added by the IP earlier today  (Adding about the Daily Mail to the lede I mean, I already took care of a minor WP:BLP violation in the 'Health concerns' section.) OK - due to busyiness this is all I have time for with regard to this article. Best of luck with it! FeydHuxtable (talk) 12:39, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for the barnstar, as well as commenting on the article! I appreciate this is not my area of expertise either, which is why I wanted to get the input of editors on recent edits which have been made to the article.
 * re: the Daily Mail claim, I think it is referring to this article – but as you say, I'm not sure about the appropriateness of citing this in the article for the claims with are being made, per WP:DAILYMAIL and WP:OR. --Bangalamania (talk) 13:39, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Don't post on my talk page again
Thanks. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 12:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , my apologies if the request was not appreciated. I did not intend it to be spam. --Bangalamania (talk) 13:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Masja Loogman moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Masja Loogman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 10:20, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

AFC
Hello. I thought Draft:United Citizens' Alarm was pretty decent, although it could use a little more work. I do think it would survive AfD if nominated. Is there some reason you are using AFC rather than moving it directly to article space?--- Possibly (talk) 19:17, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks for the edits, I really appreciate that! My main reason for using AfC was because I had originally created the article before and had it deleted, and just wanted some eyes on it that weren't my own before it goes into mainspace. If you think it should be moved into mainspace then go ahead! --Bangalamania (talk) 19:24, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I did indeed move it to article space. The group was profiled by the Washington Post and the Guardian, and there is lot of other coverage. Thanks. --- Possibly (talk) 19:44, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

The Passenger (novel)
Hello! I came across Draft:The Passenger (novel) and did some work on it. It's clearly notable and ready for mainspace now, so I put in a request at WP:RFM to move it to The Passenger (novel) which, as you pointed out, is currently a redirect. Thanks. --- Possibly (talk) 02:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh wow, thank you so much for doing the work on that one! – Bangalamania (talk) 08:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Akane Yamaguchi
Hello. Help copy edit. Thank you. Vnosm (talk) 12:49, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Frenemies (podcast) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frenemies (podcast) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Frenemies (podcast) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Throast (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Diversity Champions
Hello, Bangalamania,

Thank you for creating Diversity Champions.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"This article can be developed more, including with the references and citations that are already present."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FULBERT (talk) 16:45, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

James Charles (Internet personality)
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article James Charles (Internet personality) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:23, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mwazulu Diyabanza
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mwazulu Diyabanza you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indy beetle -- Indy beetle (talk) 08:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Removal of a page you created under A7
I nominated a page you created under Db-person and the page was deleted almost immediate before I managed to give you notification and I apologise for the lack of notification, one could have argued I should have used e.g. Twinkle but I didn't. I also had to RL transport someone somewhere and that can up immediately after the nomination although deletion occurred before that event. I remain of concern of some of your edits at Matt Hancock but I am not looking further at this point. I shortly intend to check if you have received or acknowledged a Ds/alert and will likely issue one if not. This is routine and the issuing of the notification is relatively standard on controversial blp's and in itself implies no issues with any edits. Djm-leighpark (talk) 13:34, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Djm-leighpark (talk) 13:37, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

I am also aware, if I am not mistaken, that you brought the from a redirect to an article. In my personal opinion CSD:A7 does not apply to that article, and I am also minded the split reasoning seems reasonable in my opinion. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 13:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Boris Johnson
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Boris Johnson has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN moving forward.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:35, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mwazulu Diyabanza
The article Mwazulu Diyabanza you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mwazulu Diyabanza for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indy beetle -- Indy beetle (talk) 12:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Passenger (Boschwitz novel)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Passenger (Boschwitz novel) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:21, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Passenger (Boschwitz novel)
The article The Passenger (Boschwitz novel) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Passenger (Boschwitz novel) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Not worried
Like you said on Talk:Autism and sexual orientation, I'm not worried about where I am under the LGBTQ+ umbrella, as it is a spectrum, of course, and like you, I'm still figuring it out myself, and I have no deadline for when I figure that out. But one day I'll figure it out at some point, I think. We'll see what happens. --Historyday01 (talk) 22:37, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Absolutely! Sexuality and self-discovery is a queer path to navigate. I certainly know that looking up things on Wikipedia was one thing that helped me in discovering myself in that regard, finding the right terms to put to my feelings, and discovering things about the LGBTQ+ community as a whole. (Plus, it's always fun to read someone's "Personal life" section to see if my gaydar is accurate without having to go to some gossipy website...)
 * The best way we can help others like us is to improve information on LGBTQ+ topics on this website, and you have definitely done an amazing job in that regard! 🌈🌈🌈 –Bangalamania (talk) 23:15, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Definitely! Wikipedia definitely helps in that regard. Yeah that's true, reading a personal life section can be fun, for sure. Improving information on LGBTQ+ topics is a great way to help others and I've done a lot with that over the last year and will continue to do it, for sure. --Historyday01 (talk) 03:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Rebecca Hutson
Hello, Bangalamania,

Thank you for creating Rebecca Hutson.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"This page needs to conform to notability for Biography of Living Persons."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 07:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Passenger (Boschwitz novel)
The article The Passenger (Boschwitz novel) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Passenger (Boschwitz novel) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Italygate conspiracy theory

 * Hi Bangalamania, I've noticed the second paragraph is bereft of citations, which are needed per WP:BLP and WP:VERIFY; we are dealing with real people's lives here so everything needs to be cited. I've tagged the article with cn and Refimprove; feel free to remove these when it's fixed . It's OK, someone else has fixed this now. Lucky, huh? ;)  Baffle☿gab  01:50, 20 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Haha yeah, that was a quick response! Was just about to look through the citations myself and I saw they'd been cited lol. Thank you for the copyedit! –Bangalamania (talk) 01:58, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 21:31, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Jarel Robinson-Brown for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jarel Robinson-Brown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jarel Robinson-Brown& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  scope_creep Talk  18:02, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Boris Johnson
Hello. You have recently contributed to this article or its talk page. Please see this discussion on the talk page. You are welcome to take part if you are interested. Thanks. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:05, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Masja Loogman
Hello, Bangalamania. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Masja Loogman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of COVID-19 contracts in the United Kingdom
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article COVID-19 contracts in the United Kingdom you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mikehawk10 -- Mikehawk10 (talk) 02:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of COVID-19 contracts in the United Kingdom
The article COVID-19 contracts in the United Kingdom you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:COVID-19 contracts in the United Kingdom for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mikehawk10 -- Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Fixed your talk page archiving
Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 07:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Ah, much appreciated! 😊 —AFreshStart (talk) 07:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Noah Oppenheim&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 21:31, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:List of soft-skinned vehicles of the United States Armed Forces&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 13:31, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Southend
Thanks for trying to stop the city vandalism Davidstewartharvey (talk) 16:13, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem! Although the issue may be bigger than just one page; I recently came across, who has been changing Southend's town/city status on a wide range of related articles (I was alerted because of their unusual edit summary on the main page). —AFreshStart (talk) 16:18, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

'Commonwealth English'
With regard to 'Commonwealth English', please see this discussion. The template you just tagged for deletion should have been deleted as part of the previous discussion, it seems I just missed it. In any case, the appropriate place to apply for deletion is WP:TFD, not WP:MFD. RGloucester — ☎ 23:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah, I definitely remember seeing and taking part in this discussion on Wikipedia before; thank you! Sorry for the procedural error. —AFreshStart (talk) 23:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 13:31, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Darren McCaffrey moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Darren McCaffrey, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  scope_creep Talk  18:14, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Masja Loogman
Hello, AFreshStart. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Masja Loogman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:00, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mike Gapes
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mike Gapes you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 15:20, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Blanche Azouley/ay
Do any of your sources spell her name the way you have done: Blanche Azouley? All I can find spell her surname Azoulay. I'm moving the article. Please be more careful. Thanks. Pam D  16:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I now see that the Wikidata entry was wrong, and so therefore the WikiProject Women in Red/The World Contest/Missing articles/Africa and the WikiProject Women in Red/The World Contest/Missing articles/Africa had her wrong too ... but still, please be careful to check with the sources. Wikidata is far from infallible (and it seems to cite no sources for her, so I don't know where her incorrect entry came from - whether it was mistyped, or copied from an inaccurate source!) Pam  D  16:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * My apologies; I should have double-checked with the sources, as I did go off the erroneous Wikidata entry (and WiR entries) and didn't notice the error. —AFreshStart (talk) 17:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of London Forum (far-right group)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article London Forum (far-right group) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mikehawk10 -- Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of London Forum (far-right group)
The article London Forum (far-right group) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:London Forum (far-right group) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mikehawk10 -- Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:41, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Plan S
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Plan S you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 07:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Plan S
The article Plan S you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Plan S for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 07:21, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GANs have been reverted
Hello. I am writing to let you know that I have removed all of the out-of-process good article nominations that you have submitted. You have only contributed to one of these nominated articles, Moggmentum, and while it is technically allowable for a non-significant contributor to nominate at GAN, many of these nominations are for articles that would be quick-failed on sourcing issues. Health effects of tobacco, for instance, has multiple inline cleanup tags, which would be an automatic failure even for a nomination that you had significantly worked on. You have already been warned under your previous username for not following GAN procedures properly. Please only nominate articles that you have significantly worked on and that you believe meet all six criteria. —  Ghost River  17:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of London Forum (far-right group)
The article London Forum (far-right group) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:London Forum (far-right group) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mikehawk10 -- Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Draftification
Hello, AFreshStart,

Just a reminder, when you move a page from main space to Draft space, please tag the original page for speedy deletion, CSD R2. It will help bring it to the attention of admins who patrol CSD categories. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:03, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for London Forum (far-right group)
— Maile (talk) 12:03, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Jonathan Strong (slave)
Hello! Your submission of Jonathan Strong (slave) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mind matrix  21:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GAN of Women and Families for Defence
I have quick failed this nomination. The entire article is 147 words, it is near impossible for such a short article to be a GA. From a very cursory look into the topic, it's clear that the article is anything but a comprehensive overview of the subject. I've noticed this is not the first time you have been told that you are improperly sending articles that are not even close to ready for GAN to the GAN process. Please discontinue this behavior, it's a waste of everyone's time. In general, if an article is not even long enough to be DYK eligible, just about any reviewer will quickfail it as not sufficient in length or coverage of the topic. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:50, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Dermot Morrah
Hello! Your submission of Dermot Morrah at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 01:39, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Template:Meiteimyth navbox long
Please note that PROD is not used on templates (see WP:PROD): you need to propose Meiteimyth navbox long for WP:TFD. I've deprodded it (it looked dreadful on the stub I've just sorted, Meitei folklore). Pam D  09:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Looking at it again: as you are the only substantial editor of the template it can go for CSD G-7, so I've nominated it thus. Pam  D  09:06, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your help! —AFreshStart (talk) 15:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mike Gapes
The article Mike Gapes you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mike Gapes for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 17:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Dermot Morrah
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Ruth Crosby Noble
M AN d ARAX •  XAЯA b ИA M  01:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Broccoli mandate
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 13:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)


 * theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 01:32, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lübeck disaster
Hello! Your submission of Lübeck disaster at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! David notMD (talk) 15:32, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Approved. David notMD (talk) 22:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a survey about medical topics on Wikipedia
Dear fellow editor,

I am Piotr Konieczny, a sociologist of new media at Hanyang University (and User:Piotrus on Wikipedia). I would like to better understand Wikipedia's volunteers who edit medical topics, many associated with the WikiProject Medicine, and known to create some of the highest quality content on Wikipedia. I hope that the lessons I can learn from you that I will present to the academic audience will benefit both the WikiProject Medicine (improving your understanding of yourself and helping to promote it and attract new volunteers) and the wider world of medical volunteering and academia. Open access copy of the resulting research will be made available at WikiProject's Medicine upon the completion of the project.

All questions are optional. The survey is divided into 4 parts: 1 - Brief description of yourself; 2 - Questions about your volunteering; 3 - Questions about WikiProject Medicine and 4 - Questions about Wikipedia's coverage of medical topics.

Please note that by filling out this questionnaire, you consent to participate in this research. The survey is anonymous and all personal details relevant to your experience will be kept private and will not be transferred to any third party.

I appreciate your support of this research and thank you in advance for taking the time to participate and share your experiences! If you have any questions at all, please feel free to contact me at my Wikipedia user page or through my email listed on the survey page (or by Wikipedia email this user function).

The survey is accessible through the LINK HERE.

Piotr Konieczny Associate Professor Hanyang University If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Jonathan Strong (slave)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC)


 * theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 02:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Your edit to Nathaniel Fadipe has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Sennecaster ( Chat ) 23:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Lübeck disaster
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Precious
You are recipient no. 2684 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you —🎄☃️❄️ Season's greetings from AFreshStart (talk) ❄️☃️🎄 22:12, 21 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The DYK got the article 4,300 views over a 'before' of less than 20/day. David notMD (talk) 14:06, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Peter Pharoah
Hello! Your submission of Peter Pharoah at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Silver seren C 23:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for "Christmas tree" files
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 24 December 2021 (UTC)


 * theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 03:14, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Nathaniel Fadipe
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of When Harry Met Santa
Hello! Your submission of When Harry Met Santa at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 05:53, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ruth Crosby Noble
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ruth Crosby Noble you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for North West Lancashire Health Authority v A, D and G
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jeremy Pemberton (priest)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jeremy Pemberton (priest) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eviolite -- Eviolite (talk) 17:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ruth Crosby Noble
The article Ruth Crosby Noble you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ruth Crosby Noble for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 23:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jeremy Pemberton (priest)
The article Jeremy Pemberton (priest) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jeremy Pemberton (priest) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eviolite -- Eviolite (talk) 03:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Michelle Mone, Baroness Mone
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Michelle Mone, Baroness Mone you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 16:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Michelle Mone, Baroness Mone
The article Michelle Mone, Baroness Mone you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Michelle Mone, Baroness Mone for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 17:41, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Mike Gapes
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 6 January 2022 (UTC)


 * theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 02:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Prawo Jazdy (alleged criminal)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 8 January 2022 (UTC)