User talk:AG191D

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 20:59, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pavel E. Smid
An article that you have been involved in editing, Pavel E. Smid, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Deskford (talk) 23:40, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Prod tag removal
I noticed that you're quite new here and that most of your edits have been to remove "prod" (short for "proposed deletion") tags from quite a number of of articles. Normally, such tags should only be removed if the reason given is invalid or the issues stated can be quickly resolved. Your edit summaries that an article "could be notable" might be sufficient for a speedy deletion tag but is not appropriate or sufficient for a prod tag.

Also, if you must remove a prod tag, please be sure not to also remove the other tags than have been applied to the article if their concerns remain unresolved. Thanks. - Dravecky (talk) 00:12, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Making proposals
While I don't think your proposal will be well received, the correct place to suggest stuff like this is WP:Village pump (proposals). I removed your section from WP:AN. Cheers, –xenotalk 18:35, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree (on where the proposal belongs), and have re-posted it at Village pump proposals: Village pump (proposals). Equazcion  ( talk ) 18:39, 30 Dec 2009 (UTC)


 * Back on May 7, 2008, someone from this IP emailed me asking me to checkuser them to prove that he was a member of a certain profession, so he could put that on his user page and make edits in that profession without bullying. Turned out to be Dereks1x.  Later that year the IP was involved in this report.  In November 2008 the IP was involved in this report.  There have not been any non-Derek1x editors on that IP in the past, and 8 different checkusers have checked it at one time or another.  While I can't prove to a legal certainty that AG191D is Dereks1x and not someone else at the same workplace, his edits today to the admin noticeboard suggest otherwise. Thatcher 20:46, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

The fact remains. Thatcher, you complained on AN and were getting people to support your position on AN. When there was an opinion questioning whether all the rules had been followed (but didn't really support your enemy), you were vindictive enough to search people's IP.

If that isn't spying and vindictiveness, nothing is. After doing that, Thatcher wrong brands me a sock.

Thatcher has failed to adequately explain why he was snooping and looking at IP's except to look for a reason to silence editors.

Thatcher has also failed to explain why if my IP shows that I cannot be Derek (reason for blocking Derek is completely incompatible with my IP...further information cannot be given without violating my privacy but anyone who knows the identity of my IP will know that I cannot be Derek. A hint...it would be like saying to an editor that he has a conflict of interest writing about the Bank of England but the editor is editing from the French Army computers...clearly the French Army person is not a banker)

Thatcher knows that no administrator is going to stand up against a checkuser. Thatcher should do the honorable thing and question why he is snooping because he didn't like someone's AN post. AG191D (talk) 23:02, 30 December 2009 (UTC)