User talk:AG20044018

May 2020
Hello, I'm Rosbif73. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Boeing 777X, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rosbif73 (talk) 10:07, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Do not mark major edits as minor
Hi AG20044018! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —J. M. (talk) 00:05, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Once again, please stop marking major edits as minor. A minor edit means just a correction, a wikilink, a small formatting or wording change that does not change the meaning, or reverting vandalism. Any edit that adds content to an article, even a single word, is a major edit. Marking major edits as minor is a breach of etiquette on Wikipedia, so please stop doing it. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 17:07, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Do not mark major edits as minor, part 2
Hello. Again, please do not mark major edits as minor. You keep marking all edits as minor, but many of them are major, including contested or unsourced information that eventually gets reverted (e.g. ). A minor edit does not add or remove information to or from an article. Not even a single word. A minor edit should never be contested and reverted. Please stop marking major edits as minor, as it constitutes disruptive editing. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 17:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited British Rail Class 507, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Stop vandalising Wikipedia
Stop marking your edits as minor and stop adding unsourced edits. Intentionally marking major edits as minor constitutes vandalism and if you continue, you may be blocked from editing. The same applies to persistent addition of unsourced material. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 19:17, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boeing 777. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 20:13, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Boeing 777, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 20:22, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

ANI discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. FozzieHey (talk) 15:16, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) because of abuse of editing privileges in that area. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)