User talk:AGRR

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
 * Place  on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
 * Make your case on the article's .

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 11:51, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 13:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Please read the standards of Wiki Articles.
Your page will be deleted, you are not allowed by wikipedia policy to write about yourself. If you are notable enough for inclusion someone will have to write the article for you and demonstrate reliably why you are notable. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 14:06, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.)  -- Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  19:05, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 21:03, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Alexander Goldscheider
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Alexander Goldscheider. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Alexander Goldscheider. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:17, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Alexander Goldscheider
When I first saw the article, I just saw another autobiography, which unfortunately we get a lot of that for the most part are just vanity articles, and not very notable at all. One of the main tenets of Wikipedia is that it should be written from a neutral point of view which is pretty much impossible to do when you are writing about yourself. I also saw that you had already written a similar article that was speedily deleted a few months ago, so I initially assumed this was just a second attempt. However, I decided to start a deletion discussion instead of just tagging it again for speedy deletion since it did seem more notable than what I saw at first glance.

Besides the COI issues, another reason I nominated it for deletion is that the articles don't explain clearly why they are notable. Everything just sounded banal and obscure. The rationale you gave at the deletion discussion of why the articles are important are things that should be explained in the article itself. Another thing I noticed is that many of the references (at least the English ones, since I can't read Czech) were to sites like last.fm, discogs, and musicbrainz, which aren't considered reliable sources (mostly because they are also user-submitted).

So what I would recommend for you is to gather reliable and verifiable sources written about yourself, your company, your record label, and your albums, and post them at the deletion discussion and on the talk pages for yourself and Terezin: The Music. You can read Verifiability for information on good sources for the article. At this point you shouldn't be actively involved in the actual editing of the articles, due to COI issues, and have other editors work on it directly. The best way for you to be involved would be to provide sources and other information on the talk pages. This way you can make sure the information is correct while at the same time being uninvolved enough to make sure that the articles can remain NPOV.

If other editors still decide that the subject isn't notable enough yet for Wikipedia, we can have it moved to userspace if we need to, instead of it being deleted. Sorry this is such a difficult process. It's done that way to prevent any bum off the street from posting their life's story as an encyclopedia article. I'm watching this page, so let me know if you have any other questions. &mdash;Akrabbimtalk 04:31, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Terezín: The Music 1941-44
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Terezín: The Music 1941-44. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terezín: The Music 1941-44. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wriggler (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crash (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:09, 31 March 2013 (UTC)