User talk:AGSman61

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Opération Harmattan, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Terrillja talk  04:10, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Lybian state TV is not a reliable source. By any stretch of the imagination.-- Terrillja talk  04:27, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I never said western media. I said something outside of Libya, which has been shown to be manipulating the media.-- Terrillja talk  04:38, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:45, 20 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Note from blocking admin: I have had no involvement in the article content. The block was a direct result of your making repeated personal attacks, which you've repeated in your unblock request. Such requests are unlikely to result in your account being unblocked - but could potentially result in the block being extended and/or your talk page access being revoked.  To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
 * the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
 * the block is no longer necessary because you
 * understand what you have been blocked for,
 * will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
 * will make useful contributions instead.
 * --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:56, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Just an FYI: http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/310436/france-denies-plane-shot-down-libya-- Terrillja talk  05:02, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * And so because the French denied they lost a warplane, automatically makes it true. But if Libya denied losing the tanks the French claim to have destroyed, that would be "unreliable" wouldn't it, Terrillja? Biased, biased, biased. - AGSman61
 * I never said if it was true or not. I didn't say you're wrong, see some web link. I said FYI. Information is power. Chill.-- Terrillja talk  05:08, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * But it's okay for the French claim of destroyed tanks to stay up? You don't know if that claim is true or not. Libya has not admitted it. So therefore, you're logic is circular. You're being biased, and cencoring sourced information. - AGSman61

By the way, Terrillja, where is your evidence of the French or American claims? You claimed that the Libyan source lacks evidence and that it's an unreliable source. But you have no evidence to prove coalition claims. We use links as information... whether one is true or not is not up to you to decide. Wikipedia is supposed to be nutral and show both sides reports. Everything is a "report" not a fact that can be proven beyond doubt. All we have to go on with the French claims is a "report", a link... all we have to go on with the Libyan shot down claim is a "report", a link. So do tell me... whats the difference?? - AGSman61

unblock
 * Since you don't seem able to move past personal attacks, I think we're done here. Kuru   (talk)  01:31, 21 March 2011 (UTC)