User talk:AGorski28/Response to Intervention

Instructor Feedback
You are off to a strong start. I have a few suggestions:

The lead sentence uses the word "intervention" repeatedly to define something with intervention in its name:“In education, Response to Intervention (RTI or RtI) is an approach to academic intervention used to provide early, systematic, and appropriately intensive interventions to children who are at risk for or already underperforming as compared to appropriate grade- or age-level standards. “

Rewrite it to use “assistance,” “academic support,” and/or “supplemental instruction.”

Most people will not know what “universal screeners“ are. Add a sentence about how students are systematically identified as needing support.

The full name "Multi-Tiered Systems of Supports" should appear in the lead when the acronym is introduced. Note that the name is “tiered” not “tier”. Add link to the MTSS article.

Benchmark assessments should be explained and connected to universal screening.

“Support for Implementation” is a heading that can be misinterpreted. I suggest “Reasons for Implementation.” I would also move that section up to the section before "Fidelity of Implementation" because the article is lacking the information that RTI was originally conceived as an alternate to the discrepancy method for identifying students with disabilities.

The second paragraph in this section over uses the word “fidelity.” Lndmayg (talk) 10:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)