User talk:AHeneen/Archive 2

WikiCup 2015: The results
WikiCup 2015 is now in the books! Congrats to our finalists and winners, and to everyone who took part in this year's competition.

This year's results were an exact replica of last year's competition. For the second year in a row, the 2015 WikiCup champion is. All of his points were earned for an impressive 253 featured pictures and their associated bonus points (5060 and 1695, respectively). His entries constituted scans of currency from all over the world and scans of medallions awarded to participants of the U.S. Space program. came in second place; she earned by far the most bonus points (4082), for 4 featured articles, 15 good articles, and 147 DYKs, mostly about in her field of expertise, natural science. , a finalist every year since 2010, came in third, with 2379 points.

Our newcomer award, presented to the best-performing new competitor in the WikiCup, goes to. Everyone should be very proud of the work they accomplished. We will announce our other award winners soon.

A full list of our award winners are:


 * wins the prize for first place and the FP prize for 330 featured pictures in the final round.
 * wins the prize for second place and the DYK prize for 160 did you knows in the final round (310 in all rounds).
 * wins the prize for third place and the FA prize for 26 featured articles in all rounds.
 * wins the prize for fourth place
 * wins a final 8 prize.
 * wins a final 8 prize.
 * wins a final 8 prize and the FL prize for 11 featured lists.
 * wins the most prizes: a final 8 prize, the GA prize for 41 good articles, and the topic prize for a 13-article good topic and an 8-article featured topic, both in round 3.
 * wins the news prize for the most news articles in round 3.

We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2016 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

, and  18:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks. AHeneen (talk) 02:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

The Center Line: November 2015
  Volume 8, Issue 4 • November 2015 • About the Newsletter

1=
 * Departments

• Assessment roundup

• Portal selected articles and pictures

• KML Corner 1=
 * Features

• Constructing a road junction list

• WikiConference USA 2015

• The Junction template and you

• Harnessing map archives 1=
 * State and national updates

• State updates

• In other project news...

 Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
 * —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of on 22:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

help with info box renaming
Saw your your post about renaming the regions of France in info boxes. I was looking for a well defined task like this work on to better familiarize myself with wiki tools. Has anyone started working on this yet. Otherwise I am thinking about giving it a go Lonjers (talk) 21:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)


 * No. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask. AHeneen (talk) 21:52, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Ok so I am slowly working on this. Anyway have some questions. So one way to do this is a pure find replace of the name of the region in all locations on each of the articles(department,arrondissements, ect articles) not just in the info boxes. This is the simplest approach and has the advantage of fixing things in many more places. My only worry with this approach is that there might be cases were the old name should remain in the article. I can't think of any cases like this but maybe you know of some. The more conservative approach would be literally only to update the name in the info boxes. We could also define a list of safe places to do updates so I was thinking info boxes plus any links to the region but skip the pure text references. Also wondering if someone else is handling editing the region articles themselves. I don't want to put the new names in until there are pages to redirect to. Lonjers (talk) 05:19, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Just wanted to try out this ping thing had never seen it used before very cool Lonjers (talk) 05:21, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Ahh cool looks like the new articles are already created. Lonjers (talk) 05:30, 17 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I thought about suggesting a find-and-replace in the entire article, but decided it would be too hard to explain when the old region should be kept. Also, there are thousands of articles that need to be changed, so it is too difficult to read each article and determine the places where the old name needs to be kept. I think the most important thing to do is change the infobox. If it is possible and easy, you can change the first sentence...for example Wingen, Bas-Rhin says: "Wingen is a commune in the Bas-Rhin department in Alsace in north-eastern France." Here, "Alsace" needs to be replaced with "Alsace-Champagne-Ardenne-Lorraine".
 * Before you start, I have a question: did you see the request at Bot requests or my discussion at Module talk:Wikidata? I do not think it will be a problem to change the name in the infobox, but it would be better to use the Wikidata value. AHeneen (talk) 19:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)


 * So I have the code that at least gets all the names of all the articles that need fixed for all levels above caton. It is actually a little harder to just do the info boxes than a replace everywhere but not much. And then we don't have to worry about some weird context where we don't want to rename. I have the code to modify arrondissement boxes just need departments and communes. I did not look into useing wikidata. I will look into it though. Anyway the current code is sitting in https://github.com/utilitarianexe/wiki_france_region_rename. Hopefully I will finish by this weekend. Then we have to go through the approval process. I doubt I did this the best way though as it is my first try at this. But we will see what they say. Lonjers (talk) 03:19, 2 January 2016 (UTC) Oh I will talk to the person you refernced about how to do wikidata integration. Lonjers (talk) 03:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Made a request here https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Authority_control#Regions_of_France for the property I need to use wikidata to get this to work with wikidata. Will continue to finish up the code to do it either way. Keep getting distracted by other projects. Lonjers (talk) 21:35, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Bot request now open. Decided not to do the wikidata integration yet as many of the articles that need fixed don't even have wikidata entries so they will need text replaced anyway. But will still work towards that goal. Bot request is here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval#Lonjers_french_region_rename_bot Lonjers (talk) 20:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)


 * OK. Thank you very much for your help!!! AHeneen (talk) 23:09, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Eckwersheim derailment
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016 is just around the corner...
Hello everyone, and we would like to wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2016 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. There are some changes we'd like to announce before the competition begins.

After two years of serving as WikiCup judge, User:Miyagawa has stepped down as judge. He deserves great thanks and recognition for his dedication and hard work, and for providing necessary transition for a new group of judges in last year's Cup. Joining Christine (User:Figureskatingfan) and Jason (User:Sturmvogel 66) is Andrew (User:Godot13), a very successful WikiCup competitor and expert in Featured Pictures; he won the two previous competitions. This is a strong judging team, and we anticipate lots of enjoyment and good work coming from our 2016 competitors.

We would also like to announce one change in how this year's WikiCup will be run. In the spirit of sportsmanship, Godot13 and Cwmhiraeth have chosen to limit their participation. See here for the announcement and a complete explanation of why. They and the judges feel that it will make for a more exciting, enjoyable, and productive competition.

The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. The judges are committed to not repeating the confusion that occurred last year and to ensuring that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Figureskatingfan (talk), and Godot13 (talk).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eckwersheim derailment
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eckwersheim derailment you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Eckwersheim derailment
I believe you're the primary mover in the GAN. I've left my notes there. To summarise, I think my main worry is that it's a subject in flux a bit, so I'll want an assurance it'll be kept up to date. Some minor issues otherwise, those I think can be left to be explained in the review, and they don't block promotion, just... things to look at. Please ping me when you respond there. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:05, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * This has now been promoted. Thought it was meant to tell ye that automatically. Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016: Game On!
We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016: Game On!
We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 March newsletter


That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. Forty-seven competitors move into this round (a bit shy of the expected 64), and we are roughly broken into eight groups of six. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups.

Twenty-two Good Articles were submitted, including three by, and two each by , , , and. Twenty-one Featured Pictures were claimed, including 17 by (the Round 1 high scorer). Thirty-one contestants saw their DYKs appear on the main page, with a commanding lead (28) by. Twenty-nine participants conducted GA reviews with completing nine.

If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. ,, and --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016 March newsletter (update)
Along with getting the year wrong in the newsletter that went out earlier this week, we did not mention (as the bot did not report) that claimed the first Featured Article Persoonia terminalis of the 2016 Wikicup. ,, and .--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Jean Lapierre
I invite you to ongoing RfC discussion. --George Ho (talk) 19:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016 May newsletter


Round 2 is over and 35 competitors have moved on to Round 3.

Round 2 saw three FAs (two by and one by ), four Featured Lists (with three by ), and 53 Good Articles (six by  and five each by, , and ). Eleven Featured Pictures were promoted (six by and five by ). One Featured Portal, Featured Topic and Good Topic were also promoted. The DYK base point total was 1,135. scored 265 base points, while and  each scored 150 base points. Eleven ITN were promoted and 131 Good Article Reviews were conducted with completing a staggering 61 reviews. Two contestants, and, broke the 700 point mark for Round 2.

If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. ,, and -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. Wynne
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:07, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Bank Markazi v. Peterson
— Maile (talk) 00:56, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bank Markazi v. Peterson
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bank Markazi v. Peterson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Notecardforfree -- Notecardforfree (talk) 06:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:01, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Poya Bridge
— Maile (talk) 12:01, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Foster v. Chatman
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bank Markazi v. Peterson
The article Bank Markazi v. Peterson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bank Markazi v. Peterson for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Notecardforfree -- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Saverne Tunnel
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Saverne Tunnel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 02:41, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Saverne Tunnel
The article Saverne Tunnel you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Saverne Tunnel for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 03:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Saverne Tunnel
The article Saverne Tunnel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Saverne Tunnel for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 13:01, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

You're invited! Great Buckeye Wiknic 2016


Hello there! You are invited to attend the Great Buckeye Wiknic in Columbus, Ohio on Sunday, July 10th from 1:00 to 5:00 PM! Join us for a day in the park for food and socializing with others from the Wikimedia movement. We'll be meeting up at Fred Beekman Park, a park on Ohio State University's campus.

If you're interested, please take a look at our events page for more information, including parking info, food options, and available activities. If you plan on attending, please add your name to the attendees list. We look forward to seeing you!

If you have any questions, feel free to leave one on my talk page. Thanks! ~ Super  Hamster  Talk Contribs 05:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

(Note: If you would like to stop receiving notifications regarding Wikimedia events around Ohio, you may remove your username from this list.)

Regarding a matter you mentioned
Hello AHeneen, thanks for reviewing the Armenian Monastic Ensembles of Iran articles. Nice to see that its a GA now. I saw you mentioned that you wouldn't be able to visit Iran anytime soon as you're an American? Why so? Quite a few Americans that I know have visited Iran (yes, both pre- and post-Revolution) without any difficulty. Except if you're being screened or have some kind of "history" that makes you being blacklisted, theres absolutely no reason as for why you couldn't visit Iran easily. :-) Just wanted to let you know. Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 15:13, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

North Philadelphia station
Thanks for your help with the GA! I've nominated it for DYK, so hopefully it'll be on the front page soon as well. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Arbcom case you might be interested in
I just filed an arbitration request against, citing an example in which you were involved in. You might be interested in the case. Link is here:. Thanks, Banedon (talk) 05:23, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Just a note to let you know that in the current political climate, your comparison of TRM to a US presidential candidate may be perceived as uncivil.  Mini  apolis  14:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Just a note, I absolutely take any comparison to Trump as a direct and vile personal attack. I would ask you, with respect, to redact it.  If not I will certainly be seeking sanctions against you in due course, regardless of the Arbcom lynching.  Also, although I usually expect to see my user name abbreviated only by those who respect me and work with me, and not those who are character-assassinating me, if you insist on doing so, please ensure you spell it T R M, not R T M, or any other kind of combination.  Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:45, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Arbitration Case opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Arbitration/Requests/Case/The Rambling Man.

Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/The Rambling Man/Evidence.

Please add your evidence by September 17, 2016, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/The Rambling Man/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.

For non-parties who wish to opt out of further notifications for this case please remove yourself from the list held here

For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited LGV Est, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vandières. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

The Rambling Man arbitration proposed decision posted
A proposed decision has been posted in the open The Rambling Man arbitration page. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. If you are not a party, you may opt out of further notifications regarding this case at Arbitration/Requests/Case/The Rambling Man/Mass Message List. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:36, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016 November newsletter: Final results
The final round of the 2016 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2016 WikiCup top three finalists:
 * First Place -
 * Second Place -
 * Third Place -

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:
 * Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a three-way tie with themselves for two FAs in each of R2, R3, and R5).
 * Good Article – MPJ-DK had 14 GAs promoted in R3.
 * Featured List – produced 2 FLs in R2
 * Featured Pictures – Adam Cuerden restored 18 images to FP status in R4.
 * Featured Portal – produced the only FPO of the Cup in R2.
 * Featured Topic – and Calvin were each responsible for one FT in R3 and R2, respectively.
 * Good Topic – MPJ-DK created a GT with 9 GAs in R5.
 * Did You Know – MPJ-DK put 53 DYKs on the main page in R4.
 * In The News – and, each with 5 ITN, both in R4.
 * Good Article Review – MPJ-DK completed 61 GARs in R2.

Over the course of the 2016 WikiCup the following content was added to Wikipedia (only reporting on fixed value categories): 17 Featured Articles, 183 Good Articles, 8 Featured Lists, 87 Featured Pictures, 40 In The News, and 321 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2017 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. ,, and

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup December newsletter: WikiCup 2017
On 1 January 2017, WikiCup 2017 (the 10th Annual WikiCup) will begin. This year we are trying something a little different – monetary prizes.

For the WC2017 the prizes will be as follows (amounts are based in US$ and will be awarded in the form of an online Amazon gift certificate):
 * First place – $200
 * Second & Third place – $50 each
 * Category prizes – $25 per category (which will be limited to FA, FL, FP, GA, and DYK for 2017). Winning a category prize does not require making it to the final round.

Note: Monetary prizes are a one-year experiment for 2017 and may or may not be continued in the future. In order to be eligible to receive any of the prizes above, the competing Wikipedia account must have a valid/active email address. After two years as a WikiCup judge, Figureskatingfan is stepping down. We thank her for her contributions as a WikiCup judge. We are pleased to announce that our newest judge is two-time WikiCup champion Cwmhiraeth.

The judges for the 2017 WikiCup are, , and.

Signups are open now and will remain open until 5 February 2017. You can sign up here.

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Isfahan Metro.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Isfahan Metro.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 05:57, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Isfahan Metro.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Isfahan Metro.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Majora (talk) 06:26, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Isfahan Metro.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Isfahan Metro.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 06:35, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Lokomotiv Yaroslavl Yak-42 crash
G'day from Oz; although you typed out a detailed explanation of your page move, the finite size of the edit summary box means that it wasn't recorded for posterity. The use of "air disaster" or "disaster" is not uncommon in air crash articles; "plane crash" sounds awful in my opinion. Cheers YSSYguy (talk) 10:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I agree that plane crash is not a good term, but it is at least descriptive and, in my opinion, "air disaster" is an even worse term. You could start a discussion on the Aviation Wikiproject about a better term. For now, though, WP:Disaster should be considered and the term "air disaster" should be avoided. AHeneen (talk) 10:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Florida State Road 538
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Florida State Road 538 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 04:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Isfahan Metro.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Isfahan Metro.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Florida State Road 538
The article Florida State Road 538 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Florida State Road 538 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 02:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Isfahan Metro.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Isfahan Metro.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. czar 04:38, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Florida State Road 538
The article Florida State Road 538 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Florida State Road 538 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 11:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Oroville Dam crisis
Mifter (talk) 12:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017 WikiCup newsletter
And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:


 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
 * 🇪🇺 Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
 * 🇯🇵 1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
 * Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.

The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.

So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Gulf carriers, from its old location at User:AHeneen/sandbox/Gulf carriers. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. North America1000 23:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for MV Havila Harmony
Materialscientist (talk) 05:45, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Brown v. Maryland
Mifter (talk) 00:01, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Import-Export Clause
Mifter (talk) 00:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

The Center Line: Spring 2017
  Volume 9, Issue 1 • Spring 2017 • About the Newsletter

1=
 * Departments

• Assessment roundup

• Portal selected articles and pictures 1=
 * Features

• Commons and Wikidata revamp

• Route logs for junction lists

• Finding friends at the DOT

• This space for rent 1=
 * State and national updates

• State updates

• In other project news...

 Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
 * —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of on 01:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

File:MH370 satcom analysis October 2014.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MH370 satcom analysis October 2014.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indila, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Warda. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017 WikiCup newsletter
The second round of the competition has now closed, with just under 100 points being required to qualify for round 3. YellowEvan just scraped into the next round with 98 points but we have to say goodbye to the thirty or so competitors who didn't achieve this threshold; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Our top scorers in round 2 were:


 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber, led the field with five featured articles, four on birds and one on astronomy, and a total score of 2049, half of which came from bonus points.
 * 🇯🇵 1989 was in second place with 826 points, 466 of which were bonus points. 1989 has claimed points mostly relating to anime and Japanese-related articles.
 * Peacemaker67 took third place with two FAs, one GA and seven GARs, mostly on naval vessels or military personnel, scoring 543 points.
 * Other contestants who scored over 400 points were Freikorp, Carbrera, and Czar. Of course all these points are now wiped out and the 32 remaining contestants start again from zero in round 3.

Vivvt submitted the largest number of DYKs (30), and MBlaze Lightning achieved 13 articles at ITN. Carbrera claimed for 11 GAs and Argento Surfer performed the most GARs, having reviewed 11. So far we have achieved 38 featured articles and a splendid 132 good articles. Commendably, 279 GARs have been achieved so far, more than double the number of GAs.

So, on to the third round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Bouxwiller, Bas-Rhin
Vanamonde (talk) 05:08, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Indila
Mifter (talk) 04:53, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Star Athletica, L. L. C. v. Varsity Brands, Inc. at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 10:01, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Star Athletica, L. L. C. v. Varsity Brands, Inc.
Hello! Your submission of Star Athletica, L. L. C. v. Varsity Brands, Inc. at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 23:08, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

File:MH370 satcom analysis October 2014.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MH370 satcom analysis October 2014.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Precious two years!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:37, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

File:MH370 satcom analysis October 2014.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MH370 satcom analysis October 2014.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 31 May 2017 (UTC)