User talk:AIPACSUCKS

This article has subjective misninformation on Elizabeth Warren, and goes against everything we expect from Wikipedia on such a prominent public figure.

It states "Warren's push to regulate consumer credit has been shown to make credit more expensive and less available, leaving people poorer."

FALSE = SUBJECTIVE = PURE NONSENSE !

First purchasing something on Credit is a debt, plain and simple you have to pay for what you purchase.

Second for every subjective statement that is made to the contrary there are easily as many made to support regulations most paramount is the fact that the easy lending and credit caused a disastrous BUBBLE POP that most economist agree has now destroyed more American wealth from the poor and middle class than the "Great Depression."

EVERY ECONOMIST agrees there has NEVER been a larger gap between rich and poor than there is now. So these statements are in my opinion meant to discredit sound economic principle and even if you disagree there is no argument they are subjective and do not belong on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AIPACSUCKS (talk • contribs) 20:08, November 1, 2014‎

please change her article as it will not let me edit and this is really embarrasing.
 * An edit request should be mad eon the talk page of the article in question, not on your talk page. Meters (talk) 20:16, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. Kevin Gorman (talk) 21:50, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

I would like to appeal the block as did not realize my name would appear or that I was in violations by choosing a name that was disagreeable to some. I would have appreciated some democratic warning or discussion at least before I was "Banned indefinately." I am not saying Edgar has bad intentions or wish to paint them in a bad light, more I feel it was a bit over-zealous a conviction without at least giving me a chance to change my screen name. I did not know the using term "SUCKS" was indicative of someone that is incapable of reason as pointed out and in this I would have to say all media that has used it at times would be guilty as I. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AIPACSUCKS (talk • contribs) 16:12, November 5, 2014‎
 * You need to use the unblock request template as shown above if you want an admin to notice this. Meters (talk) 17:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Put the edit request on the talk page of the article itself as opposed to your own personal user talk page. --DavidRabahy (talk) 18:40, 11 December 2014 (UTC)