User talk:AJTaliesen

Welcome!
Hello, AJTaliesen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. HighInBC 14:50, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi
I was just leaving you a welcome message as well, and conflicted with the other editor. Please do read the links in the welcome message above, so that you understand the bases for making decisions here (this place is not a wild west!) and then please come to Talk:Regulatory science to discuss that content -- I opened a section a while ago, when I removed the content, and no one has commented yet. I really do look forward to discussing this content, based on Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 14:52, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Edit war warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Regulatory science. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jytdog (talk) 14:58, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

November 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Christmas tree has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:08, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Christmas tree was changed by AJTaliesen (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.915795 on 2016-11-23T22:08:28+00:00.