User talk:AKFrost

I welcome all comments, however. If you'd like to post criticism, my requirement is that you do the following:
 * Think about what you're going to say to me before saying it. Is it necessary? Does this achieve something other than using both of our times?
 * Does your post satisfy WP:WQ and WP:CIVIL?
 * Are you willing to debate it out should I find your criticism objectionable?
 * Are you willing to change your mind should I prove you wrong? Not saying I will, but as human beings neither of us is infallible.

The bottom line is this: If you aren't going to approach with an open mind, then posting here does nothing other than waste your time and mine. I acknowledge that I make mistakes and I can piss people off. However, if you want to get something out of your time you spend posting here other than a WQA or a RfC, then I suggest you do it in a way that doesn't make you just as bad as what you perceive of me.

Pretentious/CWC
"You're being about your own editing, inadequate as it is." AKFrost 07:09, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

That is not very nice of you. If you had bothered to look at the history of either the article itself, or my userpage, you might find that I was referring to the first AFD this article was saved from. It would have most certainly been deleted had I not rewritten it the first time, and I am glad it has survived your pointless AFD. I have now updated the userpage to reflect the change in AFD's saved from the previous "One", to the current state of "Two". Looks like I right either way. It also looks like you made a bit of an arse of yourself with your claims of my pretension.

I'm sorry if my editing is inadequate to you, how I can measure up to your edits on a crappy japanese childrens cartoon followed by your AFD nomination which you lost. Please.. Please. Tell me how to become a better editor.

Macktheknifeau (talk) 17:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

WQA
Hi AKFrost,

I just wanted to see if you've had a chance to read my response to this thread at WP:WQA. As you can see, I've recommended simply disengaging from each other for the time being as a solution--Macktheknifeau has since posted that he's all right with this, so I wanted to check and see if this is an acceptable solution to you as well before I close the alert. Thanks! -- jonny - m t  04:40, 13 December 2007 (UTC)