User talk:AKM722

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! DougsTech (talk) 17:42, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of Joan Gerling
A tag has been placed on Joan Gerling requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. DougsTech (talk) 17:42, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Helpme
Are you talking about an article? Or something you're thinking of creating?

Wikipedia is not censored. --  Chzz  ►  17:26, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Its content has been merged into a different article, and the link itself (Silverballers) will now lead there instead. THat would suggest that some or all of the content was deemed inoffensive. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 17:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * If it's a deleted article, the reason for deletion should have been given to you. Also, you can ask the deleting administrator to put the article back into your own userspace. If you do that, someone could have a look at it and give you guidance.

There is no censorship, as a quick glance at articles like cunt etc (re. language), os various of the well-illustrated articles on sex, bondage etc etc. We make no judgements at all about what some people consider offensive and others don't. Of course, we have to abide by the law regarding where the servers are (Florida), also we don't tolerate any form of personal attacks, but apart from that, no censorship at all.

--  Chzz  ►  17:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

P.S. I just found the [older version] - and no, there's nothing offensive at all.

It was merged because I think someone felt it covered the same material as the other article.

If you don't agree with their decision, or want to discuss it, you should do so on their talk page first - which is User_talk:De728631. If I can help further, please ask me on my talk page.

Good luck with it all!

--  Chzz  ►  17:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Silverballers
Hi. I see you found out how to revert my redirect to your old version. I've still got a problem with the article though, because it seems to be about a fictive gun based on the Hardballer, not a real gun, no? Single pieces of equipment in games, literature and whatever fiction usually don't get an article at all on Wikipedia, simply because they are not noteworthy enough outside their fanbase. If you can proof how the Silverballer is important enough, we might keep the article, otherwise you could include your text to the Hitman: Blood Money article on here. Please note also that WikiProject Guns deleted your content from the real Hardballer article immediately after I made the changes, so much for notability. De728631 (talk) 13:10, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, first of all we need to know which Canadian company produces this gun. Then, if it is actually real, all reference to Hitman must be removed from the main article, WikiProject Guns does not allow "popular culture" use like games in real gun articles. And since the main Hitman article is not overly big at all, I wouldn't open a separate Hitman weapon article either, a new section in the main Hitman article will do. De728631 (talk) 15:06, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I just found that the "real" Silverballer is actually sold as an airsoft gun, so you must mention this in your article and describe the airsoft features, like pressure, rounds and some such, NOT the gaming features. De728631 (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok, you may of course create a Hitman weapons page, but as said above, I don't think it is needed. If you create a seperate page, I don't think it will survive very long. You should open another section in the main Hitman article. De728631 (talk) 15:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Kruger-Schmitt is definitely not real, there is no such company in Germany. It exists only in the game, that's why I redirected your new stub. De728631 (talk) 15:33, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Btw, Hitman (series) has already a brief section on weaponry, how about you expand that? De728631 (talk) 15:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I already gave you the link (blue text in the line above). And there's also the search function to the left, which comes very handy. De728631 (talk) 16:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Hitman weapons
Nice job! I've proofread your article and added some code, but all in all it looks quite fine. De728631 (talk) 14:27, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Hitman weapons
I have nominated Hitman weapons, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Hitman weapons. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. M ASEM (t) 19:44, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Deletion notice
When an article is nominated for deletion, please do not removed the notice at the top of the article as you did here. If you have any questions or want to know more about the deletion process, go ahead and ask me. Thanks! &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  21:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Hitman Assassins
I have nominated Hitman Assassins, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Hitman Assassins. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —   Levi van Tine  ( t  –  c )   06:48, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Please do not assume ownership of articles. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Once you hit "save page," anybody can edit an article. – PranksterTurtle (talk) 16:03, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Yes, this does apply to you. Your redirects are in violation of the three revert rule and lead to a competitor's product. CrispMuncher (talk) 16:52, 20 March 2009 (UTC).

Speedy deletion of Hitman Agents
A tag has been placed on Hitman Agents requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Acroterion  (talk)  17:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Hitman Killers
A tag has been placed on Hitman Killers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cerejota (talk) 18:08, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Cerejota (talk) 18:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Hitman Killers
A tag has been placed on Hitman Killers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wperdue (talk) 18:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Wperdue (talk) 18:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''You have been warned before, so I am upgrading this to a level 3 warning. Please read the links provided to you in the welcome message above, and follow our criteria for content. Also read WP:CSD to understand the speedy deletion process.'' Cerejota (talk) 18:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Hitman Assassins
This topic is simply not notable enough to warrant its own article. I've noticed that you've now had 3 of your created articles flagged for deletion in one form or another. Instead of creating these articles, why don't you work on improving the existing Hitman articles? They could use the work. —   Levi van Tine  ( t  –  c )   07:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Suzuki RF400R for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suzuki RF400R is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Suzuki RF400R until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:36, 16 December 2012 (UTC)