User talk:ALFMGR

Proposed deletion of Elveno Pastorelli


The article Elveno Pastorelli has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No sources, no indication of notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Slywriter (talk) 20:39, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Elveno Pastorelli for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elveno Pastorelli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Elveno Pastorelli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Slywriter (talk) 21:45, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

I've nominated because having an article on Italian wikipedia does not mean they are suitable for English Wikipedia, which has different policies and is generally stricter than other languages. Additionally, a review of the Italian wikipedia article shows that many of the sources there are passing mentions (or in at least one case do not mention the subject at all), which means adding them here wouldn't improve notability. While the article is at AfD, there is nothing stopping you from improving the article or providing sources in the AfD discussion that show the subject does meet notability. It's certainly possible the community will have a different opinion than I do. Slywriter (talk) 22:05, 4 February 2022 (UTC)