User talk:ALLEN NEILSON RAGHU VARMA

Proposed deletion of ALLEN NEILSON RAGHU VARMA


The article ALLEN NEILSON RAGHU VARMA has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. -- MST  ☆  R   (Chat Me!) 10:19, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Multiple accounts?
Are you the same person as TRIPLE MIND SIMON CHART and User:Anr varma? If so, why do you have more than one account? JamesBWatson (talk) 10:34, 2 September 2012 (UTC)


 * User:Kalainesan also appears to be a related account. Is that correct? --bonadea contributions talk 12:41, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, it looks rather as though you may have misunderstood the nature of Wikipedia, and a significant amount of work you have done has been deleted. I can well imagine that this is likely to be frustrating, but I will try to explain to you the reasons, in the hope that this will help you avoid similar problems in the future if you continue to contribute to Wikipedia.

What you have written looks very much like your own original research work about a person, but Wikipedia's policy is that Wikipedia is not a medium for publishing original research: we only accept articles which record content which has already received substantial coverage in reliable published sources. In addition, policy is that articles are written from a neutral point of view, and do not contain expressions of personal opinion or commentary, but the content you wrote contained a significant amount of personal opinion and commentary. For example, "It is unbelievable that there are more than a few hundreds of unknown obscure vintage artists who are not located on most art databases or art web archival" (whether it is unbelievable is a matter of opinion); "It is a great wonder in art world"; "His photo image is not yet properly compiled and recorded due to negligence and carelessness of art media world"; and so on. Also, Wikipedia policy is that a subject can have an article about it only if that subject has notability demonstrated by substantial coverage in multiple third party reliable sources. However, the person you wrote about does not, as far as I have been able to find, have such coverage. Indeed, you yourself complained that he has not received the coverage and attention that you think he deserves. It seems that you have been trying to use Wikipedia to gain publicity for a person you believe deserves to be better known than he is. Apart from the issues I have mentioned above, there is also the fact that writing in Wikipedia to get more publicity for a subject, i.e. to promote the subject, is against Wikipedia policy.

In view of the issues that I have outlined, the article you wrote has been deleted. In addition, the user pages you created appear to have been draft material for that deleted article, and there does not seem to be any purpose consistent with Wikipedia policy for keeping them, so they have been deleted too.

If you wish to make contributions in line with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, you are welcome to do so. Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:01, 3 September 2012 (UTC)