User talk:AMH1992

Pictures keep getting deleted
I have been trying to upload a picture of an actress (Sanaya Irani) but it keeps getting deleted. It is not my own but a picture I found from the internet. I put in the source and the author but it still gets deleted. I don't know how to upload a picture on her page without it getting deleted. I am using the Wikipedia Commons for this as my account has still not been confirmed. Should I do it after it has been confirmed? AMH1992 (talk) 18:58, 15 November 2013 (UTC)


 * If you found the image on the internet, it's almost guaranteed to be copyrighted and non-free. In that case, uploading it to the Wikimedia Commons is a copyright violation whether or not you give the source. Wikipedia itself allows non-free images only under very special circumstances, one of which is that no free image exists or could be produced. For living persons, that's practically never the case since someone could meet the actress tomorrow, take a photo of her, and release it under a free license. Thus, please do not upload non-free images of her, neither to the Commons nor to Wikipedia itself. We're better off without an image than with a copyright violation, and uploading copyright violations repeatedly will see you blocked from editing. Huon (talk) 19:19, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the reply. One more question, if someone does meet her and then uploads the picture, will that be deleted as well? AMH1992 (talk) 20:09, 15 November 2013 (UTC)


 * That depends. The copyright holder, likely the photographer, must release the image under a free license that allows everybody to re-use and modify the image for any purpose, including commercial purposes. Our preferred license is the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License, though some others are also acceptable. If the image has been released under such a licence, it will not be deleted. If it hasn't, it would still be non-free and subject to deletion. Huon (talk) 20:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Alison Sweeney has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Alison Sweeney was changed by AMH1992 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870053 on 2013-11-14T18:37:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Sanaya Irani.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Sanaya Irani.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. January ( talk ) 21:06, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Sanaya Irani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Indian and Artesia


 * Mohit Sehgal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Indian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rang Rasiya (TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Action, Romance and Thriller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Archane Taide.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Archane Taide.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abhi (talk) 07:50, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Misuse of Fair-Use rationale
Please do not continue uploading images of biography subjects and claiming them as fair-use. As Huon explained to you in two sections near the top of your user talk page, such images almost never qualify as fair use as it is expected that obtaining a free image is possible. You are claiming that the images are the "subject of sourced commentary" in your rationale, but that is not correct. The copyrighted files are not the subject of the discussion, they are simply being used to illustrate the article subject. I would suggest that you discontinue uploading any images files of biography subjects until you have a better understanding of Wikipedia's policies on copyright and image use; it is better that an article lack an image in the infobox than to have one that potentially puts Wikipedia in a position of culpability.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:17, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Final warning regarding your continued image copyright violations. Despite previous warnings you continue to upload images that misrepresent licensing information. It is clear that you do not understand Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please do not continue to upload images; if there are any additional copyright violations you will be blocked from editing.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:12, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:19, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Sanaya Irani photoshoot cropped.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sanaya Irani photoshoot cropped.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:54, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

If there is a picture of a celebrity that we want to upload and the picture was published by a friend of theirs on twitter, can we upload it on Wikipedia? Will there be copyright issues with that?

AMH1992 (talk) 18:20, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Material posted on Twitter (or any other website for that matter) does not automatically fall into the public domain The person who took the photo still owns the copyright. So no, we cannot accept photos copied from Twitter. -- Diannaa (talk) 19:58, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Question about sources
When I update an article with information that has sources, it automatically gets deleted. I wanted to update the awards and nominations section for an actor but all of it got deleted and the reason was given us "not sourced". What more proof is required than video proof of the actor receiving the award? Wikipedia doesn't accept YouTube as a source so we cant put that in and not every time someone wins an award will there be an article saying he/she did so. Information that is not reliable gets deleted but even that which is reliable gets deleted too. When I update the date of birth of an actor, that also gets deleted saying its not a reliable source. There are videos all over of the actor celebrating her birthday. When information pertaining to the actor's career is included in the career section, it is edited with the reason "pure crap". Important information should be included in their biography but it just gets deleted every time.

I have copyright violations so I am not updating or editing from now on. But the page just keeps getting edited again and again and all the important information is being taken down with lame reasons presented. If video proof is required of birthday, appearances, awards, etc. I can give that proof. The article is Sanaya Irani. AMH1992 (talk) 21:19, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, I have reformatted this talk page because new comments belong on the bottom. For biographies of living people, we need reliable sources. If you post information from an unreliable source, it can be removed. Reliable sources are typically newspapers, magazines, mainstream news websites, things of that nature. Basically, reliable publications that have a clear editorial policy. Gossip sites don't count, fansites don't count, blogs typically don't count, etc. I can't speak to why TRPoD called some content "pure crap", but I probably would have deleted it as well because the article is about Sanaya Irani, not about her co-stars. Adding this extraneous information to tables tends to invite more and more unnecessary information, which results in bloat. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:48, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the reply. What about the date of birth, and awards? There are videos of her accepting her awards, can this be added to the page? There were editorial articles that were put in as references of her U.K. trip recently but even those were deleted. The reference was BizAsia which is a news website that reports only confirmed and reliable information. AMH1992 (talk) 22:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, if you are responding to a specific user, you should contact them on their talk page instead of using a, which will bring by any random editor who happens to be checking. Date of birth should also be supported by reliable sources, as should award acceptances. There are other issues too, for example, Wikipedia isn't interested in every single award the subject has won. We want to focus on notable major awards, and notable major awards should presumably have major websites that have lists of winners. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:10, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I've asked TRPoD to swing by. Hopefully some of your specific answers will be answered, as I don't have the familiarity that they do. Since you are confined to your account, if you have specific questions for another editor, you should use this template, which will help get their attention:
 * Hi, I have a question: blah blah blah...
 * You can substitute any user after the pipe "|". Don't include the "nowiki" text. Regards. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:19, 7 March 2014 (UTC)


 * If your questions are about the content removed in this edit, i think the edit summary explains it all. The birth date has been contested and as a point of personal information about a living person, we need the highest quality sourcing, not random celebrity gossip websites. Tellychakkar is not a reliably published source, particularly for promotional items such a "awards" - they are the media wing of a PR firm whose business it is to pump their clients. It is an article about Irani, and actors have virtually zero influence about who their fellow co stars are, therefore name dropping "co-stars" is just an attempt to cling to fame by association and not worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia article about Irani (unless of course you have a reliable source that speaks about things like the Megasuperstar specifically requesting for her to be in their movie or a marriage resulting from having met on a particular set, or a pairing that spans multiple films and has commentary for the recurrence of the pairing - Laurel & Hardy, Bing Crosby & Bob Hope Road to ... movies, Kathryn Hepburn & Cary Grant etc.).-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  23:13, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rang Rasiya.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Rang Rasiya.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)