User talk:AMK152/Archive Six

WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants April 2007 Newsletter




7th Heaven - Family Tree
Here's a link that another user, Hunster, gave me which might help you out with extending those family tree lines to Sam & David. [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Familytree[/url] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Robinepowell (talk • contribs) 19:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC).

List of former members of the United States House of Representatives
The tag is an eyesore, first of all. Secondly, I think suggesting a breakup of the article is premature, considering how incomplete the article is. I've put a lot of time and effort into this article, and would like to see it to completion before a breakup is discussed. Valadius 03:06, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, I understand. - A M K 1 5 2 (Talk • Contributions • Send message) 03:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

My asnwers
1. What is the WikiProject best at? Letting members know how to help

2. What could the WikiProject improve upon? More talking between Users about articles

3. What are some guidelines you believe the editors of SpongeBob SquarePants articles should follow? Standard Wiki

4. Where do you help the Project and/or SpongeBob SquarePants articles the most? Watch for errors in the Trivia

5. List additional comments/concerns/suggestions here. Spongebob p-owns! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NFAN3 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 12 April 2007 (UTC).

SpongeBob Characters
Why did you remove the template from the pages it was on? --98E 21:14, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Because they are already on their own template. - A M K 1 5 2 (Talk • Contributions • Send message) 21:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, you're screwing it up! --98E 21:23, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * How? - A M K 1 5 2 (Talk • Contributions • Send message) 21:24, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * By redirecting the template to a different one that makes doing it redundant. --98E 21:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Not if the template tag you made is removed. - A M K 1 5 2 (Talk • Contributions • Send message) 21:28, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

cats
why do they make grizabella fell not liked
 * What? I don't understand. - A M K 1 5 2 (Talk • Contributions • Send message) 20:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Template: Lego
The reason I remove the list of themes in the template. Is because there is no reason to repeat or list the all the name of the themes. Since the word 'THEMES' is already mention. In other words no point to list/show or mention it twice. Template: Lego is becoming more of a 'external link' or a list of everything. It should be a general guide, so a user is guided to the next section. If you 'click' onto to 'Themes' you are guided to the list of themes. Also the last version of the 'Template:Lego' somethings/fansites/people are not part of the Lego Group.

You are doing a good job...but its getting kinda messy and overloaded with too much information.

I have one question why did you pick the color of 'RED'? The light blue before was good. It wasn't a strong color. GoTLG
 * Well, I removed themes from the Products, put Products as its own section. How are people gonna easily go from Lego to Lego Rock Raiders or from Legoland California to Lego Mindstorms? - A M K 1 5 2 (Talk • Contributions • Send message) 02:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, and I chose red because that's the main color of the logo. - A M K 1 5 2 (Talk • Contributions • Send message) 02:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I undstand it would be easyier to browe and see the other themes.  The problem is there is too much 'junk' or stuff in the template specially in 'Themes'.  Template was becoming bigger than it should be.  I think the 'list of themes' section should have its owed template.   So, if someone 'click' on 'Themes'  it would goto a template just listing only LEGO themes.   I am thinking on the lines of Template within a Template in the 'List of Themes' section.   It might be easyier for someone to find what he/she is looking for without scolling up and down page. I think the Template: Lego, will have to be watch over just like the external links section.  In others people adding or expanding the Template.   The Template should be more of a general guide not the main focus of the page.  GoTLG  00:07,  23, May 2007.
 * Is it possible that we could "hide" the themes links, so they are not visible unless someone clicks on "show?" - A M K 1 5 2 (Talk • Contributions • Send message) 19:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Jamestown
Thank you for your edits on the Jamestown, New York page. One question. Do you have any references for the dates you updated in the list of mayors? I was also wondering if you could fill in the holes between Magnuson and Carlson, which should cover the Early 70s? (I guess that was 2 questions) WildWildBil 06:40, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

List of 7th Heaven characters
Just to make sure you notice, I have commented here on the talk page. Nemu 19:55, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Are you ignoring it or something? I know people can be busy, but you have made a plentiful amount of edits after I left this. Nemu 16:58, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not ignoring you. I was browsing around other list of characters lists on Wikipedia. - A M K 1 5 2 (Talk • Contributions • Send message) 19:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Just to speed it up a bit, I'll just bring the discussion here. Here is my last message from that page:
 * Articles don't regulate each other, some characters will require articles, some won't. Only featured content should be used as a base; and there isn't any really like this. Characters need to have out of universe information, and need to have reliable, non-trivial third party sources. This is pretty doubtful for the 7H characters. You're free to add who is notable, but it's obvious only certain characters are. I just kept the important characters that I could recall. Nemu 20:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Once again, I know people can be busy, but it would be nice for you, as the person that forced me into a discussion, to reply after three days. Nemu 12:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Click Here - A M K 1 5 2 (Talk • Contributions • Send message) 17:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Patrick Star
Why are you removing peer review comments posted by other editors? Bowsy (review me!) 12:10, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * They are automated. I only update the peer review comments for people to see what the article needs imporvement on. I have been the only person to updated that section of the talk page except for the people who bring the peer review to an outdated status, which if people read somethign that was updated a while ago and the article changes, they would edit the article and says hey there is nothing wrong with this fact about the article. - A M K 1 5 2 (Talk • Contributions • Send message) 19:41, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants May 2007 Newsletter




Fair use rationale for Image:Sandy's House.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Sandy's House.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2007, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Geology timescale
It was suggested to merge the Geology timescale project into the Geology project as the first one got inactive. I've seen you've done quite a bit for geology timescale. Would you be interested in joining in WikiProject Geology? Solarapex 05:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Deleting "Longevity" links
Please explain the rationale behind deleting links on the 'supercentenarian,' 'oldest people' pages, etc. There is no basis for such action, IMO.R Young {yak ł talk } 10:18, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I created a template to display the links. - A M K 1 5 2 (Talk • Contributions • Send message) 19:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Ok, but where are they displayed at?R Young {yak ł talk } 12:19, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * See Template:Longevity - A M K 1 5 2 (Talk • Contributions • Send message) 01:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC)