User talk:AMLEGALS-Specialised law Firm

May 2021
Hello, I'm MelecieDiancie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pre-packaged insolvency have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia.   •Melecie!•  ~talk~ 10:43, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:AMLEGALS-Specialised law Firm


A tag has been placed on User:AMLEGALS-Specialised law Firm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 16:36, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --AMLEGALS-Specialised law Firm (talk) 16:44, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

It is a pure content for Pre Pack Insolvency Resolution Plan and what is wrong into it as i am not able to understand.If wikipedia is for real information and correct and real information and knowledge is spread then what is that it is making for a speedy deletion.

You should rather guide as to what portion looks like rather than saying in a blanket manner that it is not as per the policy, i am surprised as to which portion is wrong, if you are doing correct things then you should convey categorically as well. Otherwise, lot of people who really wan to share correct information may hesitate to come to wikipedia if it has been claimed for years to be an open source and unbiased posting is to be done.

Otherwise, i am afraid that what is claimed is not followed by your own policy.This morning i posted where US and UK insolvency was posted and it was purely academic as lot of people would have been benefitted one gentleman in a discretionary manner simply deleted.

Persons like us neither professional who will read so much how to and what, you should guide, and if discouraged then persons like have not that much time to write again and waste so much time.Realise rather than dictating. Hoping real sense would prevail.
 * Your user page didn't conform to Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself and your Wikimedia-related activities. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Thank you. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:03, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
 * a workspace for a draft article
 * a personal website, blog, or social media site
 * a space for self-promotion or other advertising
 * a CV/resumé
 * a lengthy autobiography

May 2021
 Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 17:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)