User talk:AMM1989/sandbox

Autumn's Peer Review
I am going to copy edit this first and then go through and make notes in italics about what can be improved. I may re-write when I copy edit, they are only suggestions. Anything I think should be deleted will be bolded. Firstly, I want to say that I learned a lot from this article and I think your contribution to it will highlight key developments in recent years, which is really important. Your section is well written and informative. Everything that I point out is only because I want your piece to be tip top.

2016- Now In 2016, the Washington Post noted that issues regarding lead in DC's drinking water is decades old. [1] Within this new outlet, there are several articles demonizing the DC Water system. ''Is this entirely necessary? Does it contribute to the greater point of the article? If you think so, keep it; but if you do, I'd cite a source.''

In the 2017's DC Water Quality Report, Washington DC was found to be in compliance with the EPA's standards for lead within drinking water;[2] however, there is no safe level of lead for children to consume. [3] ''This source is a blog and our course says to stay away from those as sources. If you could find a scholarly source with the same conclusion it would be better suited here.'' The EPA regulation standards can still pose issues for the residents that are drinking this lead contaminated water. You needs a citation to make a claim like this

DC'sthe 2018 Drinking Water Quality Report contains information about the lead in Washington, DC the city's water supply. The report states that there is infrastructure in Washington, DC that containing Bold text''' lead that may impact the drinking water in certain areas. Tips for how to prevent contamination are provided on the report. [4] '''Lead is still prevalent in the Washington, DC water system due to the pipes in certain areas. All the lead pipes in Washington, DC have not been replaced and may cause an issue for those consuming the water.' this just seems redundant to me, and because there is not source for it, it seems like your opinion.''

DC Water created an interactive map to show its residents which pipe lines are made out of lead. The information was gathered from historical data and inspections. To test a given area in Washington, DC just insert the address within the search bar. [5] This tool can be utilized to determine where in Washington, DC the lead pipes are still located and the risk they can pose to the residences around it. It's a good sentence but what is said can be incorporated into the previous two to make them more complete.

Shaver, Hedgpeth, Katherine, Dana (March 17, 2016). "D.C.'s decade-old problem of lead in water gets new attention during Flint crisis". Washington Post. Retrieved 2018-10-04. "2017 DC Water Quality Report". DC Water. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017. Retrieved September 18, 2018. '''"Young Children and Lead Water Contamination: The Harmful Consequences". SimpleWater. Retrieved 2018-09-27.''' "2018 DC Water Quality Report" (PDF). DC Water. "DC Service Information". DC Water. 2016.

WaltzingwithWeasleys (talk) 16:22, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Lead Contamination Washington, D.C. drinking water Peer Review The addition does a great job of following the tone established in the article, and includes relevant and important information. The article's last section covers 2006-2010 and the addition begins in 2016, if there is any relevant information that can be included from 2010-2016 maybe you could consider adding them. Has97060820 (talk) 16:29, 9 October 2018 (UTC)