User talk:AMMOORE2000/Kombucha

Peer Review
Your evaluation was very good on the article, "Kombucha." I agree the headings depicted specific subject areas and the tone remained neutral throughout the article. Under Chemical Composition, the revision on discussing alcohol concentration and the decrease of concentration when acetic acid bacteria utilizes the ethanol made sense and your tone also remained neutral. As I was reading the two topics in your sandbox, I noticed you flipped chemical and biological headings from the original article. It made more sense to me to keep Biological heading first because it begins with the explanation of a kombucha culture, which is then discussed in the first sentence under Chemical composition. The reader would have a better understanding in keeping with the original order.

I agreed with your comment on this article needing more up-to-date citations, especially when citing journal references. The health benefits and adverse effects sections were more of interest to me to have up-to-date references on recent research, and there were a few citations dated 2020. However, the dates in the original article in the paragraph under the Chemical composition ranged from 2000-2015. It appears that you used a more up-to-date reference to edit the article. To conclude, I recommend switching the order of the two topics so that Biological is first, followed by Chemical composition and perhaps investigating and/or editing even more up-to-date research findings on the health benefits and adverse effects. Yeti2021 (talk) 02:34, 4 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your information, I completely agree with you that having the Biological aspects followed by the chemical composition would make more sense. I will also do some more research and see if I can find anything that supports  benefits amd adverse effects. AMMOORE2000 (talk) 23:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)