User talk:ANGEEEL

Speedy deletion nomination of Jenny Kim
A tag has been placed on Jenny Kim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. C T J F 8 3 chat 04:20, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Jenny Kim, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. C T J F 8 3 chat 04:21, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Persistent disruptive editing.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 07:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)


 * No, the article you created, Jenny Kim, was not deleted because it is a copy of an article that already exists. As far as I know, no other copy of that article exists at Wikipedia.  You do not understand the notability criteria, so an unblock wouldn't be appropriate.  Your use of 'us' indicates that more than one person is using this account.  Wikipedia doesn't permit group accounts, so this account won't be unblocked now in any case. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:03, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Your contributions to date have been about people who don't meet the guidelines for inclusion in Wikipedia, which means your articles would have to be deleted. See WP:BIO. In any case, an unsourced biography can be deleted within a few days, regardless of notability, and articles about non-notable children will tend to be deleted quickly to protect their privacy.  Acroterion  (talk)  19:26, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Who is "us"? --Smashvilletalk 20:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You're presenting the appearance of someone who simply doesn't have the necessary skills yet to write for a major encyclopedia. I'm sure you're very nice, but if you aren't able to read, understand, and follow the rules yet, you should focus on your studies and come back when you're ready.  Changing the word 'us' to 'me' doesn't really answer the question of how many people are using this account. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:21, 6 July 2010 (UTC)