User talk:ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE

--Ageo020 21:47, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during October 18 2006 to Talk:George W. Bush

 * I will NOT be silenced by your arrogant bullying! I will not yield; I will not back down! --ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE 20:37, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Just remember to keep WP:NPOV in mind; when people point things out,, they are not "bullying" you, but trying to help you become familiar with some of the policies and guidelines. AuburnPilot Talk 21:47, 18 October 2006 (UTC) originally posted in Talk:George W. Bush
 * I can not be helped by calling my statements "experimenting" and "unhelpful", and saying that I should basically keep my comments to the sandbox. I can not consider those statements to be anything less than an insult. If the comment was regarding the main article itself I would have accepted the criticism, but it was posted with regard to what I said on the talk page and instead of challenging me, on any particular point of my statements, just boldfaced rejected everything I said.  The initial comments may not have been intended to be insults, but they have resulted in that.  Relations are further strained when I am threatened.  Bullying involves the use of threats and insults, that is how I have come to view the comment as an initial act of bullying.  My initial reaction was to strong with the CAP LOCKS and "!"'s, but I still consider it to be bullying.  Thanks either way for trying to calm me down, but I was already calm and (almost) regretting my strongly worded statement by the time I read your post.  --ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE 01:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

GOOFY EDIT SUMMARY
Just because the edit summary is SUPER EXCEPTIONALLY SENSATIONAL doesn't mean that the underlying content is a very serious matter, at least it gave me a good laugh. But why didn't they revert my edit to Q, did they just assume that is how trek fans talk, I ought to be insulted, all trek fans ought to be insulted. --ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE 09:09, 28 November 2006 (UTC)


 * There we go! --ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE 05:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Voyager-bottom.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Voyager-bottom.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

improper integral
You missed the point in improper integral and Cauchy principal value. It is certainly true that if you integrate dx/x along any of certain contours from &minus;1 to 1 in the complex plane, you get &minus;i&pi; (if if you pick other contours, you get different values). But that's irrelevant here. Given the context, we're talking about integrals along the real line from &minus;1 to 1. Integrating dx/x over the interval (&minus;1,&nsbp;0) gives &minus;&infin; and integrating it over (0, 1) gives +&infin;. Therefore the integral from &minus;1 to 1, i.e. along that whole interval on the real line, is undefined. Nonetheless there is a Cauchy principal value, defined as a certain limit, and it is 0. Michael Hardy 00:04, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

"The Finger"
Go take a look at User talk:LBHS Cheerleader and see how I gave her an abridged version of the finger! I hate vandals like her. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 01:06, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

File:3SAT reduced too VC.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:3SAT reduced too VC.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 02:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC)