User talk:ANTOINE CASANOVA

Voynich manuscript
Sorry, but I've removed most of your addition to the Voynich manuscript page. A simple mention of your work may have a place in the list, but certainly not a section of this size. Apart from being a blatant display of self-promotion, this is a clear example of WP:UNDUE. Drabkikker (talk) 15:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

So sorry for wiki, you have truncated the information without reading it. Does presenting the solution of the Voynich manuscript Enigma has no place on wiki? What I presented on this page are only explanations without details but with translations of this famous manuscript. So, yes, your action is shocking.


 * If your research really resulted in a breakthrough, it certainly deserves mention. But one would expect that in the 20 years since your thesis was written, somebody in the field would have picked up on it, would one not? I'm afraid you're not the first, nor the last who has attempted to decipher the script using Latin abbreviations... Drabkikker (talk) 16:45, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Gordon Rugg has resumed my work for example, used it at the only one reference to develop his thesis, and he is not the only one. My thesis did not deal with abbreviated Latin but with methods in cryptanalysis to obtain results regardless of the language used. It is in French and this can cause problems for some. Regarding the abbreviated Latin, I invite you to take a closer look at the articles in question (judged in a reading committee by cryptanalysts "pro") I make the observation of two languages ​​used (The abbreviated Latin and it is not complicated, it is enough to immerse oneself in the 15th century textbooks, the second language of "voynich" is more difficult to read but is accessible since one abstracts that Roger Bacon was the author) The solution respects the grammar of the medieval Latin and the resulting translations make sense. Should we then find another solution to make believe that the solution is a higher mystery? Being a scientist, only rational facts interest me. I worked on nearly 50 languages ​​of the Middle Ages. The solution of a synthetic language mixing code and phonetics is the one that gives the best results. It turns out that the underlying language is Latin.

Great!!! You have deleted all information concerning my works. You will be very kind to explain to me why?
 * For a couple of reasons.
 * 1) It is forbidden to use Wikipedia to promote your own work.
 * 2) The only sources cited were self-published, and therefore do not meet the standards for sources. See : WP:SOURCE, specifically WP:SELFPUBLISH.
 * ApLundell (talk) 21:11, 12 February 2019 (UTC)