User talk:AOTAPSA

August 2020
Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, C. V. Raman Global University, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.    Ravensfire  (talk) 23:05, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at C. V. Raman Global University, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.    Ravensfire  (talk) 13:41, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at C. V. Raman Global University, you may be blocked from editing. ''Seriously, you need to STOP adding unsourced material. You will end up blocked from editing if you continue. The welcome message has some helpful links that show you what's needed, you need to read them.''  Ravensfire  (talk) 15:18, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at C. V. Raman Global University ‎. '' Seriously - stop adding the unsourced section to the article. If you need help with sources, ask on the article talk page, but STOP adding it as unsourced.''  Ravensfire  (talk) 22:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at C. V. Raman Global University shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.   Ravensfire  (talk) 23:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently edit warring to restore disputed agenda-driven material to C. V. Raman Global University. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Unreasonable grounds for blocking
All the contribution made in good will and up to date information of the subject which was based on the documents accessed through RTI ACT and Odisha Legislative Assembly proceedings also News reports include both print and electronic, so the allegation that it was for disruption or damage the image of Wikipedia never ever, how publishing truthful non baised edits based on document provided by Constitution Authority. So it is a valid ground for unblock of still you need the documentary proof can provide you becoz in reference reliaed source some one is deleting those sources. AOTAPSA (talk) 04:45, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Block evasion
AOTAPSA, you, the person behind the account, are blocked from editing Wikipedia. Using an IP to edit, as you did here is called block evasion and is not something that's accepted on Wikipedia. You cannot make edits like you've done without including reliable sources that support the edits, and the edits have to be in WP:NPOV, not a tone more suited for a blog or advocacy website. Please stop with the block evasion, it's not going to help you here.  Ravensfire  (talk) 19:16, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

The source is document accessed through RTI ACT and Odisha Legislative Assembly proceedings also News reports include both print and electronic but some is deleting those edits account holder can show all the document on whoch based edit was do e AOTAPSA (talk) 04:36, 20 August 2020 (UTC)