User talk:APPU/Archives/2022/February

Orphaned non-free image File:Gandhi Before India latest cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Gandhi Before India latest cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Vibha Padalkar
Hello, APPU. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vibha Padalkar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Michelle Monaghan (cropped).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Michelle Monaghan (cropped).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:46, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The above also applies to File:Rudrangshu Mukherjee.jpg. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Narendra Modi and Amit Shah having a chat.jpg


The file File:Narendra Modi and Amit Shah having a chat.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:DECORATIVE non-free use in Cronyism which fails WP:NFCC. There's no courced critical commentary of this particular photo anywhere to be found in the section where it's being used, and a non-free image of these two individuals sitting together and speaking to each other doesn't really need to be seen per WP:NFC for the reader to understand that anything written in that particular section."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The above also applies to File:Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi having a chat.jpg. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:58, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:South Indian name
Template:South Indian name has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 09:35, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Madan Gowri
Draft:Madan Gowri, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Madan Gowri and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Madan Gowri during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. CUPIDICAE💕 16:36, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Miriamne Krummel


The article Miriamne Krummel has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and does not meet WP:NSCHOLAR"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:05, 24 February 2022 (UTC)