User talk:ARIHANT SUB

Welcome!
Hello, ARIHANT SUB, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! S M S  Talk 13:26, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Kashibai
Please see wp:articles for deletion to delete an article. The article generally should be salvaged, if possible. Blanking is not the way to do it. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:55, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

I appreciate that, but the fact is their is no such person in history Kashibai who was so called daughter of Sadashiv Bhau(he was issue less till his death). A simple search on google or google books also dont give a single reference. And further it has been over 4 years that this article existed without a Single Source(as their is no such person in history like kashibai).ARIHANT SUB (talk) 04:57, 30 July 2012 (UTC)


 * You need to leave the page intact so that other editors reviewing the article have something to read. BTW: wp:proposed deletion probably would have been safe. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:42, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Ok i understand i am going for proposed deletion, does that means say we kept even the Hoax article intact and after 7 days if no source of reliable credibility is added(though actually it has been over 4 years, we can wait for 7 more days as well) then it will be automatically deleted. Thnx for help. I will undo my edit and put this deletion tag. Thnx againARIHANT SUB (talk) 05:44, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kashibai. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t &bull; c &raquo;  06:41, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

i was not aware of this, thnx for this. As the whole article is false and a hoax spread by the same editor. He has created 3 articles all useless and false.

1-kashibai 2-radhikabai 3-gopikabai

and as usual no source available for them. Further the content in those articles were such that not a single source speaks of those things claimed in the article.ARIHANT SUB (talk) 06:44, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 14:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Block for personal attacks
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.

Following your insulting rant on my talk page I probably should have blocked you for longer. However, I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt. Another rant like that and I shall block you permanently. Be warned. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Fck off, the fact is i dont wanna be on a site, where the so called admin have no knowledge of topics which they edit. You said i blanked page, those pages have "CITATION TAGS" for 2-4 years. Those articles are not verfiable from any other source or book or on net. Instead of deleting such pages, you made it an ego clash "That i am an admin and i can do whatever i like". Otherwise you still have not posted a valid reason that why should those Articles not be deleted. You got angry as i exposed your poor knowledge but this is a fact that Britain's time is over and so is your's. Be happy with your wikipedia and "your privileges as an admin and keep forcing your thoughts on other by using your power as admin and in the similar fashion such articles will bring more and more CREDIBILITY to wikipedia and to admin. Keep your site and your pages, the thing which exposed once again that how Britain is a coward country ,britain dont ruled Hindu by force but by dividing Hindu into caste and making their regiments otherwise we Hindu would have taught you the same lesson which we taught to Muslims and Mughal Empire and to Durrani Empire and to 500 Million muslims of india,pakistan,bangladesh and afghanistan.

hope to never see a sore loser like you and neither this site who have entrusted responsibility on people like you, what you want to portray by defending those two articles. The reality is that no TRUE WIKIPEDIA ADMIN will allow those articles without any citation for years to be on wikipedia but you want those two articles not because those ARTICLES ARE GREAT but because of your EGO which i exposed that people like you never accept mistake. Who dont have courage to accept their mistake, instead rant about english, grammar and all that. I dont need english, i am a hindu my language is hindi, even if i can speak 10% of english i am more brilliant than you as you filthy scum cant speak even 1% of hindi. ARIHANT SUB (talk) 11:16, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Their is also an admin like JIP, who have agreed on what i said and he did not rant against my "poor english"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2012_August_1

Here it is, JIP has agreed that another of the article i nominated for deletion must be deleted as it is simply "guesswork" of some editors without any source or anything.

Sorry for my outburst against your religion, but your behaviour really angered me, you could have accepted the truth that yes it was my mistake i should have took a look in the talk page. Or even those "Citation tags" which are untouched for years but in your "Ego" you simply deleted those articles. I am not here to blank any article, i have added in many articles as well but those articles which are not true and one of them(kashibai) is based upon a person Who never Existed, and if she do then what the article is doing when the citation tags dating 2009, are still hanging as it is.

If my Outburst against your religion and personal attacks were violation of wiki policy(which i apologize not for personal attack but for abusing a religion) then so was your instant decision to remove those tags.ARIHANT SUB (talk) 11:28, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JIP

Here he is, your decision to block me for one week or even more is fully justified as i abused a particular religion,nation and a user but my acts of putting those articles on the list of deletion were correct and justified, i have never removed a single para which has been cited alongside citations and further as i know India's History closely i can surely claim all those articles as myth and simply hoax. And the agreement of another Editor and Admin who too is from Europe but unlike you he based him opinion after going through the articles which are without A single source for many years, when even after searching so much on net we cant find a single source then the article qualifies for deletion but admin like you insist on such articles.You havent told me a single reason that why those articles should be maintained on wikipedia(apart from your personal rivalry against me).ARIHANT SUB (talk) 11:37, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Well, your desire is fulfilled. You have now been blocked indefinitely. Goodbye. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:50, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Descendants of Maratha prisoners of war (1761) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Descendants of Maratha prisoners of war (1761), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Descendants of Maratha prisoners of war (1761)


Hello ARIHANT SUB. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Descendants of Maratha prisoners of war (1761).

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 00:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC)