User talk:AROMME

Welcome!

Hello, AROMME, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -- Mdd (talk) 14:26, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

April 2013
Hello, I'm Theroadislong. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Business model, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 12:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Dear Theroadislong, Thanks for your feedback on my addition to the 'Collective business models' text on the Business Model page. I do indeed object to your removal of the addition. Makes no sense at all: the existing text refers to a "business system" page (internal link) that does not talk about 'business models' - in any way. Means that it's a text without any evidence or sources, and therefore as such does NOT belong in an encyclopedia. Therefore I inserted an example that provides an evidence-based example of a collective business model, which would repair this deficiency. AROMME (talk) 13:00, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I have assumed good faith and restored your edit, it was the name A. Romme in the reference which made me assume you were spammimg. All good wishes Theroadislong (talk) 13:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to University spin-off with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 13:44, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of NominationName for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NominationName is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/NominationName until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. DougInAMug talk 21:07, 2 April 2023 (UTC)