User talk:ASER Centre

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. If you prefer to be unblocked for the purpose of changing your username to a username which complies with our username policy, so that your contributions with this username are recorded as contributions of your new username and rather than creating a new account, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice instead. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 09:42, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Please note that: Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:54, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion of any kind, even of good causes.
 * For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from other sites - see WP:Copy-paste and for more detail WP:Copyrights. Assertion of permission to use is not enough - a formal copyright release is required.
 * It is seldom worth making a copyright release, because material written for other purposes is usually unsuitable, because of promotional tone ore excessive detail, for an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia should not be seen as a notice-board for posting existing material: the business of an encyclopedia is to summarize for a general audience.
 * Even with an individual account, before editing about the ASER Centre you should read WP:Conflict of interest and WP:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
 * Subjects for Wikipedia articles need WP:Notability, which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people independent of the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also WP:42 and WP:FAQ/Organizations.