User talk:ASH Officiel

September 2019
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:05, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Lilian Thuram. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Per WP:MOSFLAG. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:02, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * In addition, please don't add links to well-known countries like France. For the relevant section in the manual of style see MOS:OVERLINK. William Avery (talk) 10:59, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Kylian Mbappé shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. William Avery (talk) 11:21, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Kylian Mbappé, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Per MOS:OVERLINK. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:03, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Lilian Thuram. Per MOS:OVERLINK. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:37, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 13:03, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 13:08, 8 October 2019 (UTC)