User talk:AS 001

RFA
I'm sorry, but new users do not get franchise on RFA's. If you would care to provide evidence that valid !votes and valid !voters have been deleted and blocked, please provide diffs. Corvus cornix 21:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
I've blocked this account for editing as a sockpuppet. To contest this block, use the  template on this page. Regards, M er cury    22:16, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Disregard please. I seem to have jumped the gun. I apologize. M er cury   22:27, 5 October 2007 (UTC) Seems we voted discussed on the same rfa, so i'm going to let another admin look into this. M er cury   22:33, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I believe this account should be given an opportunity to edit, as the ultimate reason the prior block was upheld was a username concern that has been alleviated. I would, however, like to ask whether this user has previously edited with other accounts (excluding the one that was blocked earlier today), and if so, whether you are continuing to do so. If so, please make sure you carefully follow our policy on sockpuppets or alternate accounts. Newyorkbrad 22:35, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

I intend to stay away from the Bill Ayer article unless there is clearly something inappropriate or false, like Bill is a shithead or Bill used to be a general in the US Army.
 * Thanks. But my question was also whether you've ever edited under another username prior to or concurrent with Bill Ayer. Newyorkbrad 22:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)