User talk:AS Universal Truths

Welcome!
Hi AS Universal Truths! I noticed your contributions to ET3 Global Alliance&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 00:12, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

It's pretty obvious what you are doing: I suppose we'll just see in a few days what you are trying to accomplish on Wikipedia. In the meantime, I'd rather you edit your user page or something like that, because those mainspace edits are useless or worse. Drmies (talk) 00:14, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Champy's Famous Fried Chicken. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Drmies (talk) 00:16, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 00:24, 20 October 2022 (UTC)


 * AS Universal Truths (talk) 00:34, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Blocked
This has all the hallmarks of a fresh account created to make a few random poor and useless edits in order to get autoconfirmed and start--well, who knows. Drmies (talk) 01:55, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * It does look kind of like gaming autoconfirmed, but the edits also look like they were helping. It couldn't hurt to see what happens if we unblock.  It should be obvious if this is a disruption-only account after a few more edits. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:21, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the consideration, NinjaRobotPirate. I will be more careful on the edits I make in regards to word choice from now on. Thank you again for the opportunity. AS Universal Truths (talk) 04:42, 20 October 2022 (UTC)


 * may well be right, from the way things look, but there can be no justification for blocking on the basis that it looks as though the editor may be going to do things in the future that would merit a block. Frequently I see new accounts that look to me as though they may be tying to game the system by getting autoconfirmed. I make a note to watch out for their editing in the near future. Sometimes my suspicions turn out to be justified, and I block when that has proved to be the case; sometimes they don't turn out to be justified, so it's good that I didn't block immediately on the basis of an assumption as to what they might do in the future. I agree with, and I shall therefore unblock this account. JBW (talk) 20:49, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 * ,, the edits are awful. The block was for the "random poor and useless edits". Drmies (talk) 21:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Some of the sources cited don't look great, but the copy edits themselves seem quite reasonable. For example,  changes "Wahba encourages people to embrace the incredible power" to "Wahba encourages people to embrace the idea".  MediaWiki directs people to make these kinds of edits through Newcomer tasks, which that edit is tagged with.  Spammers sometimes try to build up credibility by making a few innocuous edits before they start spamming, but, for all we know, our own website suggested that AS Universal Truths make those edits. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2022 (UTC)