User talk:AUParty

The American Unicorn Party (also known as the AUP) was founded in 2006 for their belief in creating unicorns. Although a minority, the AUP is growing each and every day.

Beliefs
The AUP believes that America should attempt to crossbreed a rhinoceros and a horse to create a unicorn. They plan to give out unicorns to people as another form of transportation. Other things they believe in are equal rights (for every race and gender), making alliances with foreign countries, and making the world as a whole. They believe in a eco-friendly world and plan to cut costs in gas, and investing more in alternative fuels.

The political party plans to lower the US bank debt and to create more homeless shelters. AUP wants to involve everyone in their work to build a better society.

History
There is no current history of the AUP since the party was formed very recently. Although there is no current history, the AUP has been vigorously campaigning to form a larger party. Also, they have decided that the symbol for this party will officially be a turtle.

As the leader of this party put it, "There is no other way to make the world a better place than to create a species of unicorns."

Home Page
American Unicorn Party Home Page

AfD nomination of American Unicorn Party
An editor has nominated American Unicorn Party, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:41, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Your political party
Hello,

Your political party is not a frivolous political party, because it doesn't sound like it's a political party at all. I mean, being a political party would involve some sort of political activity, wouldn't it? Your article looks like nonsense, and is referenced to a web page which looks like you threw it together in ten minutes. I've marked it for summary deletion: I'm not sure what else we could possibly do. Sorry.

Regards, --Abu-Fool Danyal ibn Amir al-Makhiri 17:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * ...there are millions of articles that are short and should be deleted yet this article is targeted a lot. Also, in the spark of new political parties, people thought those were hoaxes but now they are the leading parties in the US.

Things aren't always consistent here, it's true - but being short wasn't really the issue: your party hasn't done anything, and isn't reported on anywhere, so what do we really know about it? True, everything has to start somewhere. But that somewhere isn't Wikipedia. Perhaps someday your party will do something and be reported on. At that point, we can document it. Until then, all we have is your say-so. Right?

Regards, --Abu-Fool Danyal ibn Amir al-Makhiri 18:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

American Unicorn Party
Hi! This article was previously deleted by consensus of the community in the discussion at Articles for deletion/American Unicorn Party. Please do not attempt to recreate it. Wikipedia editors are required to abide by the decisions of the community and if they do not they can lose their editing privileges in accordance with our blocking policy. Best, --Shirahadasha 19:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I've marked your user page as well. There are some good suggestions here as to where you might better find hosting for this information, as well as some reasons why we shouldn't have this here. Regards, --Abu-Fool Danyal ibn Amir al-Makhiri 19:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)