User talk:A Free Guy

Welcome!
Hello, A Free Guy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:A Free Guy/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:34, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:A Free Guy/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:A Free Guy/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:34, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 20)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:A_Free_Guy/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Non-notable. Advertising.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:35, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, I'm Hako9. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Godi media, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — hako9 (talk) 19:50, 7 December 2022 (UTC)


 * According to you, what is the reliable sources for this article? This article refers Godi Media to those journalists who writes or anchoring in favor of NDA government but almost every journalist reporting some favor and some against news about ruling government. During UPA government, NDTV celebrated its anniversary in Rashtrapati Bhavan (Presidential Palace). And many sources tells that PMO was sending decisions about what should NDTV report about central government during Dr. Manmohan Singh. Journalist Ravish Kumar those who refers Godi Media for those journalists whose opinions doesn't match with him. In many public debates, Ravish Kumar made counter question to those public who questioning Congress. And also Ravish Kumar pointed out the failure of ruling UPA government to apply govt schemes. So there is no milk washed journalist. Journalists are also divided in far right and far left ideology. If a journalist works in a media house, then he has to report according to the media house and sometimes the media house also reports in favor of the ruling party for profit. That's the crucial truth. And people should wants to know. So Ravish Kumar is also the part of it. Hope you understood my point. Thank you! A Free Guy (talk) 16:15, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * According to you, what is the reliable sources for this article? Youtube videos are generally not reliable sources. Read WP:RS, WP:RSP, WP:VIDEOREF carefully. — hako9 (talk) 17:49, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Pathaan (film), you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 12:47, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Hello A Free Guy! Your additions to Adipurush have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 09:33, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dunki (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. RangersRus (talk) 15:40, 23 December 2023 (UTC)