User talk:A Kit Agore

Welcome


Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 23:27, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=587019785 your edit] to Smith & Wesson M&P15 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:49, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * | unit_cost         = $839–1,949 (MSRP)  ref name="Product listinghttp://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Category4_750001_
 * 1%26storeId%3D750001%26filterResults%3D%26useFilter%3D%26identifier%3D1387578858186 Product listing

Sock
Hi. I hope you enjoyed the coal that (no doubt) the Santa of Wikimedia left in your stocking. Your place on the naughty list seems fated, but (glutton that I am) here is yet another reminder about the ills of abusing multiple accounts, refusing to engage in CON, ignoring the basic VER tenets of the project, and generally being a disruptive so-and-so.

I might as well also point out (for the umpteenth time) that your flat refusal to use edit summaries makes it IMPOSSIBLE to AGF for ANYTHING you do. (Bluntly most of your edits are indefensible under any project norms, so I am not really surprised, but at least if you TRIED then other contributors could consider what to do with your edits).

As I've said about a dozen times before, if you had half a notion to actually behave yourself within the established norms of the project, then you might actually have something positive to contribute. But this ludicrous multiple-user-hopping garbage is NOT the way to behave. Happy.... ah whats the point .... Guliolopez (talk) 16:16, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Enough
Hi. I've been avoiding it for months (years even), but I've (re)opened an SPI request. It's not fair that you continue to make changes outside the bounds of the project tenets. I (and others) have given you enough chances, and you keep spurning them. Previous SPIs I've allowed to die or lapse (just as an exercise in warning or reminder), but I'll pursue this one. Enough. Guliolopez (talk) 18:06, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * (Oh, and I'm going to excise that COPYVIO stuff as well. It shouldn't stand. Guliolopez (talk) 18:06, 27 December 2013 (UTC))