User talk:A R T is the name

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. El_C 07:12, 3 May 2019 (UTC)


 * ok i understand it was not my intention to breech any rules. Yes my comment is the result of my investigation but is also based on only true facts, so how can i add something then ? I thought i placed it in the comment section but tell me can i rewrite my comment to be accepted ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by A R T is the name (talk • contribs)


 * I recommend you take your suggestions on how to improve the article to the article talk page and try to gain consensus for them there. Remember to include reliable sources El_C 08:00, 3 May 2019 (UTC)


 * It appears that your "investigation" is only your own views, which is a violation of Wikipedia conventions. Please read WP:OR, which explains this. Please also sign any comment you make on Talk pages in the usual way. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 14:34, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Trump. theinstantmatrix (talk) 07:22, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

My findings are all based on the actual facts and i am not a conspiracy theorist but if you want to characterize me then i am just a practical logical thinker which make me able to find the supporting facts. A R T is the name (talk) 07:31, 3 May 2019 (UTC)


 * You are not listening to what you have been told on other articles. Wikipedia will only accept reliable secondary sources and not comment or original research from anyone. Please read WP:OR, which explains Wikipedia policy in full. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 14:40, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

moved from Talk:Trump Richard-of-Earth (talk) 02:58, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Maybe you can help me out here, what means the definition by Wikipedia to be a reliable source ? I struggle with this view. Can you help me ? A R T is the name (talk) 10:38, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

I want to add something, i have no political background , no hidden agenda i am fully independant. Further is my story based on true facts which everybody can check foor him or herself. What i only did was to connect these dots (facts) in the right context,nothing more nothing less. What is nesscary to transform my vision into a realible true source ? In other words,that my story was a duplicate of the realible true source ? A R T is the name (talk) 11:17, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Untill now I was not able to discover anyone else with this vision, but does that mean that it could not be the truth,so my struggle is what will be a deciding factor that my story is the whole truth , must it come on the news , a newspaper article, or on the radio or must there be first a judgement of a court trial ? Please make this clear for me A R T is the name (talk) 11:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

My last 3 comments are all related what i want to say now they concerning a other story about the so called Russian collusion, where i found some remarkable facts wich unveil a quite diffrent story then the official media outlets wants us to believe. All my words are based on true facts but i want first to know what your answers are to my other comments ? A R T is the name (talk) 11:58, 16 May 2019 (UTC)


 * I have added a menu of links below to help you learn how to successfully edit Wikipedia. Specifically, information must be verifiable (see Verifiability), reliable (see Reliable sources), and not a synthesis (see No original research). Wikipedia is not censored (see What Wikipedia is not) but we also do not publish fringe ideas (see Fringe theories). There are plenty of places available on the internet where you are free to publish any idea you have that does not fit this criteria so we do not feel we are hiding the truth nor curtailing freedom of speech. If these ideas get taken up by others and become mainstream ideas published in verifiable reliable sources then they can get published in Wikipedia. Until then it does not belong in the articles nor on the talk pages including this one. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 17:03, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Jeff Sessions, you may be blocked from editing. jaclar0529 (talk) 08:33, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content. CLCStudent (talk) 13:13, 5 June 2020 (UTC)