User talk:A Still Small Voice

Speedy deletion of QUESTIONS
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you.  Flying  Toaster  23:35, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Prayer and Destiny
A tag has been placed on Prayer and Destiny requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Flying  Toaster  23:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Spam in User:A Still Small Voice
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on User:A Still Small Voice, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because User:A Still Small Voice is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting User:A Still Small Voice, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:40, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Hangon
I was just going to add it for you - well done. You shouldn't delete the tag I put on, though. I won't make a fuss. Peridon (talk) 22:18, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your help Peridon.. I think the page is taking more encyclopedic shape now that i cut out 95% of the content..

God bless!

Changes
G-d is quite OK - you don't need to change that. It's a well known Jewish convention. Peridon (talk) 22:27, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Thx!
Thanks for your help Peridon.. I think the page is taking more encyclopedic shape now that i cut out 95% of the content.. God bless!
 * Looking encyclopaedic to me. Try getting a little more detail - without going towards spam or rapture... Notability needs to be established. 'The first...', 'The only...' (NOT 'The best...'!) Reliable outside references are a good idea. Makes it harder for people to argue if you have references. (BTW I doubt that your deity and mine are on speaking terms, but thanks anyway.) Peridon (talk) 22:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC)