User talk:A pinhead

March 2009
Please upload http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/5621/patcondellscreencapture.jpg so I can add it to the Pat Condell article.A pinhead (talk) 19:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you know what its copyright license is? -- Menti  fisto
 * I will add that information myself.A pinhead (talk) 19:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, here it is then. -- Menti  fisto  19:51, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Is Pat Condell a good article now?--A pinhead (talk) 19:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Condell
You will have to wait a bit longer. I am extraordinarily busy at the moment. Brianboulton (talk) 19:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Here are a few final thoughts on the article
 * The lead still needs expanding to be a full summary of the article rather than a brief introduction. Try writing a 350-word precis of the article and use that as your lead.
 * I have done some prose editing in the Comedy section. I don't have time to do any more, but it would be good if you could find someone prepared to look over the whole thing, and iron out the remaining rough patches.
 * You are still overlinking. You have Roman Catholic linked twice near the start of the article, and words like South London, deer, Canada and others that don't warrant a link. There are other instances of unnecessary links.
 * Could you clear up confusion at the end of the Comedy paragraph by identifying which performance Chortle gave a positive review for? If Chortle is a magazine it needs to be italicized.

That's really all I have time for, and I wish you success with the article. Brianboulton (talk) 00:17, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

GA review of Pat Condell
I have conducted a review of the above article. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at Talk:Pat Condell/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:14, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pat Condell
The article Pat Condell you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Pat Condell for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment.  Bramble  claw  x   22:09, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pat condell dvd.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Pat condell dvd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:08, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anjem Choudary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, A pinhead. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Pat Condell, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Guy (help!) 19:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)