User talk:A tiny white rabbit

Welcome!

 * }

June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Aiden Shaw has been reverted. Your edit here to Aiden Shaw was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQmQBI8fwIU) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:52, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, your recent edits to the article Aiden Shaw do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. When editing articles about people, please refer to Wikipedia's Manual of Style guidelines at WP:MOS and also Wikipedia's "Biography of Living People" guidelines at WP:BLP. These guidelines will state how an article should be written and the tone and style it should be written in, how to avoid fancruft or peacocking terms, and referring to the subject in a neutral/unbiased manner (using surname only, etc). It is essential that relevant details about an individual are included in articles, even if the individual would prefer that they are not. Please refer to WP:WELLKNOWN for further information. Finally, it may also be useful for you to read Wikipedia's "Conflict of Interest" guidelines (WP:COI) which highlights issues when the subject of an article (or somebody acting on their behalf) edits the article about them. Please familiarise yourself with these guidelines before making any further edits. Thank you. 88.104.24.52 (talk) 23:46, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Aiden Shaw, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:04, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Please do not delete sourced material or add unsourced material to articles as you did at Aiden Shaw. Please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia guidelines and policies for editing articles, specifically WP:VERIFY. Original research and/or the personal opinions of editors should not be included in any Wikipedia articles (see WP:ORIGINAL). Thank you. 88.104.31.180 (talk) 23:17, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello, A tiny white rabbit. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Aiden Shaw, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:33, 9 December 2014 (UTC)