User talk:A young communist/archive

''This is an archive with the oldest posts on A young communist's talkpage, and not edit it. The current discussion is here.''

Not post any welcome for me. :) It's not needed! :) and I don't want it either.

Capital punishment
I [ reverted] the series of edits you made at Capital punishment. While this sort of information is fascinating, the list is simply too long and detailed to stand without any sources whatsoever. Further, the claim that this list is exhaustive/complete is potentially controversial, unsourced, and very possibly unsourceable. As for the claim that all modern execution methods other than stoning are intended to be quick and painless, it also needs to be sourced, and I believe it is controversial as well; in particular, hanging in Iran is (as I understand) not carried out in a quick or painless fashion, since it is currently performed by hoisting the victim on a crane, as opposed to the "long drop" method generally used for judicial hangings worldwide. Rich wales (talk · contribs) 23:13, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

June 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Soviet war in Afghanistan. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. - F ASTILY  (TALK) 05:16, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Blocked for edit warring
For edit warring at, I have blocked your account for 60 hours. The appropriate way to resolve editorial disputes is to open discussion on the talk page or to engage in dispute resolution, and to request page protection if the article is being abused while disruption is ongoing. Please contact me or another uninvolved administrator, if you continue to have difficulty with the other contributors to this page. Also, if you cannot edit this page in a professional and neutral way, please abstain indefinitely from contributing to pages about the Soviet war in Afghanistan, because otherwise your account will be blocked indefinitely. Thank you. AGK [&bull; ] 13:59, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TN X Man 18:07, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * But on the Norwgian Wikipedia, sockpuppets are allowed if doesn't undergoes a block! How could I know that it's other rules here? Because I didn't knew it, can't you then unblock this user, because I haven't done anything WRONG? I mean, when all other sockpuppets are blocked, and if I swear that I'll not make any more accounts? And why does it stays "indefinately blocked" when the real length is only two weaks? A young communist (talk) 18:51, 13 June 2011 (UTC)


 * (non-admin comment) I suspect you are seeing "indefinitely blocked" at your other account, not this one. (or possibly as a result of an auto-block on your IP address, I'm not sure about that). This account is blocked for two weeks. Some of the rest of what you said might be the sort of thing you would want to put in an unblock request, following the instructions above, after reading the guide to appealing blocks and carefully writing an unblock request based on those ideas. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:48, 13 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I just have to say one thing: It is a RELATION between Norwegians and sockpuppetry. For instance both Rodelero and The Middle East Conflict Man were Norwegians. But unlike them, I didn't wanted to hurt Wikipedia. I just thought that the rules around sockpuppets was the same here as on the Norwegian Wikipedia. There, sockpuppets are allowed. But even though, I'm proud of it. A young communist (talk) 14:34, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Personal attacks against User:Carachi
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Special:MovePage/2007-2011_United_States_housing_bubble. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. I agree that User:Carachi's edits are unhelpful and disruptive, but insulting him is not the proper way of dealing with things. —Psychonaut (talk) 10:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * O.K. A young communist (talk) 22:46, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 04:01, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Where is that one? I don't see anything about me there. Can you please give a clearer thing?

A kitten for you!
After very great contributions on political articles.

A young communist (talk) 18:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC) 