User talk:AaayJay/sandbox

What am I trying to do?

My goal is to give detailed information about each character, give basic information about the structure of each issue and background information about the comics creation, give a synopsis of every issue and include the feminist issues each deals with, and make sure that the people who helped create the comic are credited for their contributions.

What is working well and what isn't and help!? When I try to save things it often doesn't save and everything disapears. I've started copying and pasting everything into Word so i don't have to start completely over everytime. I now just start off in word and then copy and paste everything into Wiki, but sometimes it still doesn't save my changes. This is getting really annoying. Is anyone else having this problem? Any advice?

I have read all the comics so I understand the basic plot of each issue, but summarizing whle still including all relevant information is a challenge. Also i'm not sure whter to just cite the whole issue or specific pages as things happen or the basic story arc.

Because I am trying to include a lot of information, creating tables has been really helpful. I'm still struggling with the formatting but the tables make it easy to organize and condense information.

I keep creating citations but the keep getting "unlinked". After I save the changes they either disappear altogether or just look like this : [1]. Any suggestions on how to fix this?

Also in terms of citations do I need to cite every sentence or can I just cite the list sentence if all of the information is from the same source.

Because the comic is relatively new (in terms of #s of issues) There isn't a lot of information about all of the characters. I plan to just include what I can.

Any format suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Also any advice on the references section and how to get it to match my citations (those already present and those I am trying to add) would be greatly appreciated.

AaayJay (talk) 15:47, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review (Sabrina Miranda)
Introductory Sentence: I think your opening sentence is great because it is informative, accurately sums up the topic, and links to important articles.

Summary: I didn’t see a specific summary but I think that your Introductory sentence, publication history, and chart with details provide a good summary.

Context: Information in the text is covered in the summary without going into too much overwhelming detail.

Organization: I think your organization is great because it flows well and makes sense, getting more detailed as it progresses. The only thing I would change is moving the introductory sentence to the top of the page, above the contents box.

Content: I got a little lost at the beginning of the Publication History when you used last names, so it might be helpful to reintroduce those people or link to their pages. I think your Plot section is off to a great start, but could use a little more information that is broad about the whole series without going too much into each edition. I am impressed with your addition of Characters and detailing them so thoroughly. I also appreciate that you added each edition and detail the characters and plots of them. I like the addition of the reception section and the way that you balanced the positive reviews with critical ones.

Citations: Your citations look great and are easy to follow in the text. The only one I would add is one for The Guardian review.

Sources: You seem to have a good variety of sources that are appropriate for the genre.

Completeness: You do a great job of filling out the references template as well as providing good links in “see also” and “external links.” — Preceding unsigned comment added by SRMiranda18 (talk • contribs) 17:13, 18 April 2018 (UTC)