User talk:Aadelse

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dolf Kessler, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dolf Kessler was changed by Aadelse (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872958 on 2010-11-16T03:44:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:44, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Dolf Kessler constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 03:46, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Dolf Kessler. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Falcon8765  (T ALK ) 03:47, 16 November 2010 (UTC) Sorry, there was a misunderstanding. I tried to indicate why I made the changes but clearly did not know how to indicate that. I did not intend vandalism; I thought there were two different people. Aadelse (talk) 19:50, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hendrik Wouda


A tag has been placed on Hendrik Wouda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ~ Matthew  Say hi!How I've helped 19:26, 16 December 2010 (UTC) I contested this request for speedy deletion. Wouda is a well-known Dutch architect and furniture designer. Aadelse (talk) 19:50, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Deolinda Fonseca
Hello, Aadelse, and thanks for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing whether the article Deolinda Fonseca should be included in Wikipedia. The discussion is at Articles for deletion/Deolinda Fonseca and you are welcome to comment there about why you think the article meets our criteria for inclusion.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Deolinda Fonseca, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk. Thanks again! Steven Walling • talk   23:07, 8 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, I know this system is confusing, but it looks like you added your comment to the talk page for the deletion discussion. In the future, you can comment right here, since it's not an article. I moved your comment so others can see as we discuss the article more. Thanks very much, Steven Walling &bull; talk   00:34, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification (for Aadelse)
Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Herbert S. Okun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * was linked to Touchstone

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:35, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

What did you think about the deletion notice you received?
Hi Aadelse,

In November you received a message about either "Nomination for deletion" or "Proposed deletion" of an article you created. I'd like to ask you a few quick questions: You can feel free to answer on my talk page or send me your response by email (mpinchuk@undefinedwikimedia.org). (I won't quote you or link your answers to your username if you don't feel comfortable with that.) Your feedback is incredibly useful for improving the content of deletion notifications, so please take a minute to think about and answer these questions. Thank you! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 19:49, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Was the message helpful? Were the instructions clear and easy to follow?
 * 2) If not, how do you think the message could be improved?
 * 3) What do you think about the deletion process in general? Do you understand how to contest a deletion?

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)