User talk:Aagaash2015

Recent edits to The Battle of the Labyrinth
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Battle of the Labyrinth, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Stesmo (talk) 21:03, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Sokka. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Chamith  (talk)  02:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Move request
A request to change the title and content of a comics article has begun at Talk:X-Men (film series). Any interested WikiProject:Comics editor may comment there within one week. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:10, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2018
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jurassic World. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:38, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to The Greatest Showman, you may be blocked from editing. Tillerh11 (talk) 20:05, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at The Open House. ''Please stop adding your own personal analysis of film receptions. We already have Rotten Tomatoes to tell us what critics thought, and we don't need further original research on top of this.'' NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:21, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2019
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Spider-Man 3. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 15:36, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello, I'm Wallyfromdilbert. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Captain Marvel (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 22:35, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Aagaash2015! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Captain Marvel (film) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 22:35, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at It Chapter Two, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 04:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Aagaash2015! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at It (2017 film) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 04:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

WP:FILMLEDE
You seriously need to read WP:FILMLEDE and stop adding unsourced claims to the intro of film articles, as you have done so repeatedly.

See also WP:LEDE for how lead sections in general are supposed to be written. In short the intro is supposed to SUMMARIZE what is in the article. In a film article any claims of praise must be supported by sources in the Critical response section. -- 109.77.207.155 (talk) 08:59, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Birds of Prey (2020 film). Sundayclose (talk) 23:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Stop adding your own analysis to Wikipedia
You need to cite someone else's statement when you want to add an opinion to Wikipedia. Adding your own opinions to Wikipedia is called "original research", and it is forbidden by policy. This includes synthesizing what multiple sources have said into a statement that none of them have individually said. To say that there's a consensus on a film, you need to cite a source that has come to that consensus. In 90% of all films, there's already one in the article: Rotten Tomatoes. You can't make up your own Rotten Tomatoes-style consensus using synthesis. You need to read through these policies and follow them, or else you can be blocked from editing. There's some more information at MOS:FILM ("Any summary of the film's critical reception should avoid synthesis, meaning it should reflect an overall consensus explicitly summarized by one or more reliable sources.") and this talk page discussion that may also help understand the issue. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Again in this edit, you have ignored the advice given to you on this talk page and in edit summaries over the years to avoid synthesis. Review 's advice above if you haven't already and start citing reliable sources. Further disruption at pages such as Black Panther: Wakanda Forever is not in your best interest. --GoneIn60 (talk) 08:32, 15 April 2023 (UTC)