User talk:Aah6734

August 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 21:33, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Deleting sourced material
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:42, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

No this isn't disruptive, the article sited is full of misinformation and clear journalistic bias that has no place being on an objective page about BTS
 * If you remove it again, you will be blocked from editing. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:48, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

I will make another account the information is not unbaised and you are biased by letting an article that sites 15 year old twitter accounts to stay up
 * Billboard is a legitimate source for music articles. Ban evasion is prohibited and threatening to do it won't get you anywhere e&pi;/  💬  21:53, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:50, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


 * You were given a final warning for repeatedly deleting sourced material; you responded by threatening to create another account if blocked and deleting it again. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:04, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

I do understand what I have been blocked for. I think it is extremely unfair and goes against what Wikipedia is supposed to stand for. How can I be blocked for wanting biased information off what is SUPPOSED to be an objective page that is being edited by someone with clear bias. The person adding the article has made multiple claims about his bias against the artist and adding an equally biased article to support his claims should not be allowed. OhNoitsJamie did NOT try and address that issue but instantly took sides. I will stop but OhNoitsJamie shows clear bias and is an ineffective admin. Aah6734 (talk) 23:48, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

if he actually cared about the integrity of the page he should have tried to address why I was deleting it rather than immediately saying Billboard is a legitimate source, which it is, I don't disagree. But the writer of the article showed clear bias and the article itself had sources such as quotes from a minor's twitter account. Aah6734 (talk) 23:50, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

How is a subjective article, even by a 'legitimate source' a meaningful contribution to an objective page? Aah6734 (talk) 23:52, 27 August 2021 (UTC)